Subject:
|
Re: Significance of stud orientation
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Mon, 28 Apr 2003 13:26:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
377 times
|
| |
|
|
Niels Karsdorp wrote:
> Writing this message, I got yet another idea: create one subpart
> for the door without frontface (as the ones I mentioned) and
> without the stud, and have the actual parts contain the studs and
> the pattern.
Sounds sensible.
> I'dd like to know if it's worth to make these changes and if
> the orientation of the studs is important now.
I would certainly appreciate it. But I don't think parts will be
rejected from inclusion in the official parts library just because the
studs aren't oriented correctly.
I have a vague recollection of having noticed that some parts exist with
two different stud orientations. Can somebody confirm this?
Play well,
Jacob (happy to have his computer back on-line :-)
--
LEGO furniture:
http://jacob.sparre.dk/LEGO/By/M%F8bler/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Significance of stud orientation
|
| Hey, I have a question about the significance of stud orientation. Many parts created before stud logos were introduced (and some parts even created afterwards) have different orientation compared to the real part. (I know back then the orientation (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
