Subject:
|
Re: Significance of stud orientation
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Tue, 29 Apr 2003 00:27:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
487 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, John Riley writes:
> I'd agree that I'd like some sort of consensus when it comes to stud
> orientation. It's not hard to check: LDView is useful for this.
> Otherwise, I won't bother with it in the future.
I can't remember if I checked or not when I initially implemented this.
Does LDView orient the stud logos the same as L3P (for non-mirrored parts)?
Also, don't forget that LDView automatically detects mirrored studs and
mirrors the logo back to look right again. You'll never see a mirrored stud
logo in LDView.
--Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Significance of stud orientation
|
| (...) Perhaps when authors go back to BFC old parts, they should also correct the stud orientations. I've made a conscious effort to do new parts with correct stud orientations, but as you say later, it may not be worth the effort. (...) 3822s01 is (...) (22 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
