 | | Re: Update on Virtual Plans —Steve Bliss
|
| | | (...) Bingo! I figured you'd get that one (and no one else would). (...) Nope, no yellow. I'm not sure why I colored them that way (it's been awhile since I worked on that file). There have been a few in black, in the original Space Shuttle set(s), (...) (26 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Update on Virtual Plans —Ben Vaughan
|
| | | | | Steve Bliss writes: (snip!) (...) What about building arms off the core? Then attach the LQ/EP's to the top and bottom? That way, you don't have the silly things hanging by their tails. Ben Vaughan buster@marsbase.com www.marsbase.com ---...--- The (...) (26 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Update on Virtual Plans —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) Do you mean structural arms, or arms with access passageways? It seems a little mean to make the crew scale ladders to get to their quarters (but not out of the question -- they are explorers and scientists; they shouldn't mind a little (...) (26 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Update on Virtual Plans —Tim McSweeney
|
| | | | | | (...) What's wrong with Shoeboxes hanging off a bar? I assume this ship is only ever designed for space flight not atmospheric. As long as the ship can withstand the force exerted by the engines (Or has inertial dampers) it's fine. Take a look at a (...) (26 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Update on Virtual Plans —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) {The Coke Cans don't have to deal with acceleration. So that's not a good example.) Maybe my goal should be that BR's final appearance should lie somewhere between the international space station and the Enterprise in apparent fragility... I (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Update on Virtual Plans —Terry Keller
|
| | | | | | (...) I am not a big ship/stations sort of guy. So if I attend such a lego-fest I will bring several standard De-Connectors to blow the thing to smithereens.(1) :-) -- Terry K -- 1. I believe that is the first time I have ever used "smithereens". (26 years ago, 15-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Update on Virtual Plans —Terry Keller
|
| | | | (...) Ah. This wasn't just because I once said I don't care if the canoe ever gets done in LDraw, is it? Just sticking it in my face and saying "See! Canoes -can- be used in space" :-) (...) I think the trunks would look better. They have that nice (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Update on Virtual Plans —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | (...) Once? I thought we had a running gag on that one. (...) Maybe I could just stuff the canoes full of trans-orange flames, ala Time Cruisers. Wow, that would be hideous. (...) That was my general hope. (...) I don't want to push too hard against (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Update on Virtual Plans —Terry Keller
|
| | | | | | | (...) Must be a running gag. It sure as hell isn't floating. (...) Hideous? I thought it was hilarious. But please don't do it. (...) That is interesting. I will have to try to remember that factoid. (...) You look like Star Trek? What an enigmatic (...) (26 years ago, 15-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Update on Virtual Plans —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Ouch. (...) Hideous, hilarious. Is there a difference? Oh, yeah. Hilarious: "I was sitting around last night, playing with some different ideas, and I threw this thing together. It's a fast little space ship. I especially like the racing (...) (26 years ago, 15-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Update on Virtual Plans —Terry Keller
|
| | | | | | | | (...) You defined those terms pretty well. (...) Good one, I had to read that twice before I got it. :-) (...) See "Hideous" above. (...) That's OK. I just received two _large_ loads of parts files. No need to add more. Please. -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 16-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Update on Virtual Plans —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | | | (...) True, this is because it makes a phytagorean trinagle, right, with 6-8-10 sides. (A multiple of 3-4-5.) I've also used this fact to make a modular tower suitable for a creeping crane (that's the correct term, right?). So far, only the tower is (...) (26 years ago, 15-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Large, strong building (Re: Update on Virtual Plans) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | (...) Has anyone used the large arch pieces to reinforce large structures? Especially the 1x12x3 full-arch. It seems like placing a few of those elements across two 'walls' of the beam-girders Terry has described above would be a decent start on a (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Update on Virtual Plans —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) I don't remember for sure, but I started working on the canoe part because I wanted to use the canoe on this model. I *do* remember that I started playing around with the idea of canoe-as-drive-port as an exercise in using SPUDs in unusual (...) (26 years ago, 15-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
