Subject:
|
Re: 1-8sphe.dat tesselations compaire image
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Wed, 4 Oct 2000 19:17:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
637 times
|
| |
|
|
"Manfred Moolhuysen" <moom@nospamchello.nl> wrote in message
news:G1w9FL.Csy@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.cad, Travis Cobbs writes:
>
> > Quite frankly, I have no idea what a 48 version would look like that
> > followed James' approach. Would there be a single row of quads with the
> > rest being made up of triangles, or a bunch of rows of quads with a small
> > number of triangles. I actually tried both variations originally in my
> > primitive substitution code and eventually gave up on each.
>
> > However, if people are interested in the 48 sphere primitive I posted, • made
> > up completely of triangles, I'll look into generating the type 5 lines.
>
> Travis, do you save any results of the variation trials ? I think we • should do
> the same thing here, make a compaire image of the different possible
> variations and decide wich one looks the best (before you start generating
> those type 5 lines).
No: they never reached the point of actually generating a sphere for
anything past the standard tesselation. All the higher tesselations
produced essentially garbage in some form or another. The reason I gave up
was that I was unable to come up with a general algorithm that worked at
all. I did have the further difficulty that the algorithms I was working on
were designed to work with n points, where n was divisible by 4, as opposed
to some fixed number of points (like 16 and 48).
--Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@san.REMOVE.rr.com)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: 1-8sphe.dat tesselations compaire image
|
| (...) Travis, do you save any results of the variation trials ? I think we should do the same thing here, make a compaire image of the different possible variations and decide wich one looks the best (before you start generating those type 5 lines). (...) (24 years ago, 4-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
