Subject:
|
Re: Primitives and long file names
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Tue, 29 Mar 2011 23:23:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
19430 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Sergio Reano wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Roland Melkert wrote:
>
> >
> > Just a thought, but you could also utilize new sub directories e.g.
<snip>
> > really 'just' a file name but a relative path.
> >
> > Roland
>
> Nooooooooooooooooooo!
> Please.........
> Do not make lDraw folder structure more complex than what is now:
> If you follow the rules of using separates folder for Unofficial files (like
> SR3DBuilder does), it will make things harder to manage since my application
> checks for best possible combination of file definition according to
> Ufficial/unofficial Hires/NormRes options.
>
> Anyway this is my opinion.
>
> Sergio
Didn't mean to cause nightmares :)
But if your program is doing 'special' stuff for those kinds of folders, does it
handle use of relative folders in models etc correctly?
Cause you could supply a model e.g. d:\mystuff\coolCar.dat and include a
special non standard part or whatever along with the main model. e.g. 999999.dat
That dat could use (also supplied) s\ parts. So you'll end up with:
d:\mystuff\coolCar.dat
d:\mystuff\999999.dat
d:\mystuff\s\someSubPart.dat
whould your software find the someSubPart.dat or will it be looking in <ldraw
location>\parts\s\ ??
Cause it 'should' handle above example correctly in respect to the standard as
far i understand it.
Roland
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Primitives and long file names
|
| (...) Nooo...ooo! Please......... Do not make lDraw folder structure more complex than what is now: If you follow the rules of using separates folder for Unofficial files (like SR3DBuilder does), it will make things harder to manage since my (...) (14 years ago, 29-Mar-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
