Subject:
|
Re: Primitives and long file names
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Mon, 7 Mar 2011 15:29:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
23000 times
|
| |
|
|
> - Continue to cram everything in 8 characters nonetheless, eg. ...
> with some extreme, almost meaningless cases like ...p/48/11-48r19.dat
Most extreme will be this with a radius >100 e.g. 11-48120. You will never know
if this is a ring or cone or whatever.
> - Go above 8 chars, ... incoherency could be cured by a few ~movedto.
This should be practicable for existing parts when you are restricted to 8
characters (e.g. by using DOS - see the post above) but will be a problem with
new parts. But what do DOS users do with already existing parts longer than 8
characters (e.g. http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?s=4345bp03c01)?
I would prefer leaving the 8 character restriction. But then we should be
consequent:
- Always using prefixes with the least common denominator (e.g. "1-4" instead of
"2-8").
- Always using the complete description (e.g. "disc" instead of "dis" or "ring"
instead of "rin").
Brickaneer
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Primitives and long file names
|
| Now that long file names are allowed in LDraw and on Parts Tracker, what should we do with primitives for which name systematics gives filenames length > 8 characters? - Continue to cram everything in 8 characters nonetheless, eg. (URL) some (...) (13 years ago, 3-Mar-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
