Subject:
|
Re: Primitives and long file names
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Wed, 9 Mar 2011 00:29:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
22908 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Joerg Sommerer wrote:
> new parts. But what do DOS users do with already existing parts longer than 8
> characters (e.g. http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?s=4345bp03c01)?
With a few longer that 8 charcter named parts, it's still relativly manageable
to make workarounds for the DOS enviroment. With primitives however, having to
do so will become much more painfull and problematic.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Primitives and long file names
|
| (...) The plus for primitives is that they don't have to be human readable. It's possible to develop a system which more than covers the full range without breaking 8 characters. For example we use up to four characters (eg. 3-16) for fractions (...) (13 years ago, 9-Mar-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Primitives and long file names
|
| (...) Most extreme will be this with a radius >100 e.g. 11-48120. You will never know if this is a ring or cone or whatever. (...) This should be practicable for existing parts when you are restricted to 8 characters (e.g. by using DOS - see the (...) (13 years ago, 7-Mar-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
