Subject:
|
Re: LDConfig_Alt.ldr
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:17:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
31137 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Anders Isaksson wrote:
> Scott Wardlaw wrote:
> >
> > I'm not a rendering expert, but you will probably want to remove the
> > standard light sources and add several more that are not very bright.
> > Lots of dim ambient light will show off the deepness of the colors
> > better than a single bright light.
>
> It's also a good idea to make all lights but one 'shadowless' so you don't
> have the spotlight effect of crossing shadows. I often put a shadowless
> light at the point of the camera, to make sure everything we see is reached
> by *some* light.
A little late, but thanks Anders.
I found the real source of the the light problem, "hidden" in the include file
named hills.pov. It contains three light sources that make Datsville flooded
with light, even when I had all the lights in the main file remmed out. That
explains a lot.
/Tore
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LDConfig_Alt.ldr
|
| (...) It's also a good idea to make all lights but one 'shadowless' so you don't have the spotlight effect of crossing shadows. I often put a shadowless light at the point of the camera, to make sure everything we see is reached by *some* light. (16 years ago, 29-Aug-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
