Subject:
|
Re: Straightening Up the MPD Format
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Sun, 4 Apr 2010 20:05:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
23912 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Michael Heidemann wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Tore Eriksson wrote:
> > Then the problem is at MPDCenter. 0 Name is a very good and recommended habit,
> > but not currently required.
> >
> > But I have thought of using 0 Name to solve this problem. When exploding an MPD,
> > the user may be prompted to either use the unique 0 FILE names (optionally)
> > created by an MPD packaging program - or - to restore the original file names
> > stored in the 0 Name statement.
> >
> > /Tore
>
> As 0 NAME is not required the only possible way of identifying a parts name is
> the content in the 0 FILE entry.
> So I have now two ways to go.
> 1) Only take the 0 FILE entry
> 2) If there is no 0 NAME entry - create one on the fly at MPD loading.
> I have to thought about that two possibilities.
>
> cu
> mikeheide
If we ever get there to create an MPD standard, I would suggest way #2: Making 0
NAME compulsary in MPD-ed files. A good safety precaution would be to prompt
user if 0 NAME data is present but doesn't match actual file name:
* Rename file and change references to it,
or
* Change 0 NAME data.
I guess with no 0 NAME data, the adding could be made completely silent and
automatic.
/Tore
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Straightening Up the MPD Format
|
| (...) As 0 NAME is not required the only possible way of identifying a parts name is the content in the 0 FILE entry. So I have now two ways to go. 1) Only take the 0 FILE entry 2) If there is no 0 NAME entry - create one on the fly at MPD loading. (...) (15 years ago, 2-Apr-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
