Subject:
|
Re: Straightening Up the MPD Format
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Fri, 2 Apr 2010 19:49:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
23619 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Michael Heidemann wrote:
> I am asking because those "embedded" files lacks an important line "0 Name:
> xyz". And for that MPDCenter does not recognize that files.
>
> cu
> mikeheide
Then the problem is at MPDCenter. 0 Name is a very good and recommended habit,
but not currently required.
But I have thought of using 0 Name to solve this problem. When exploding an MPD,
the user may be prompted to either use the unique 0 FILE names (optionally)
created by an MPD packaging program - or - to restore the original file names
stored in the 0 Name statement.
/Tore
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Straightening Up the MPD Format
|
| (...) As 0 NAME is not required the only possible way of identifying a parts name is the content in the 0 FILE entry. So I have now two ways to go. 1) Only take the 0 FILE entry 2) If there is no 0 NAME entry - create one on the fly at MPD loading. (...) (15 years ago, 2-Apr-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Straightening Up the MPD Format
|
| (...) I just tried your kd-bi.mpd that you have exported from LeoCad. Is that pure export? I am asking because those "embedded" files lacks an important line "0 Name: xyz". And for that MPDCenter does not recognize that files. cu mikeheide (15 years ago, 2-Apr-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
