Subject:
|
Re: Certifying sub-parts (was: LDraw.org 2004-03)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Thu, 16 Sep 2004 05:16:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1042 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Steve Bliss wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Ross Crawford wrote:
> > Yeah, I'm more worried about how much more difficult it becomes to certify,
> > because reviewers need to modify all the references manually, and if they
> > don't know to do that, they think it's broken and put a hold on it (like
> > steffen). Is there any way where it displays dependencies it can check for
> > an official no-x version of the sub-part, and explain what needs to be done?
>
> We could, but I'd rather not; this is an exceptional case. In general
> circumstances, we'd consider x170c01.dat to be broken.
>
> It'd be nice if there was an easier way to tell the tracker about groups of
> files that need to be released together. But then we'd have to maintain those
> links, and in some cases (where large numbers of files are involved), it would
> make releasing the parts just that much harder...
Maybe comments could be left by the submitter somewhere to prompt you when
preparing an update? Still relies on it being seen, I guess.
> > Maybe in this case I should resubmit the 170 & 171 parts?
>
> Nope. That wouldn't fix it.
Yes, I see. I could re-submit them as x170 and x171, but I don't know if the
system would let me? And besides...
> You could submit an updated x170c01. That would
> resolve the current situation.
I think that's the best solution.
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Certifying sub-parts (was: LDraw.org 2004-03)
|
| (...) We could, but I'd rather not; this is an exceptional case. In general circumstances, we'd consider x170c01.dat to be broken. It'd be nice if there was an easier way to tell the tracker about groups of files that need to be released together. (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
