To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / 11873
11872  |  11874
Subject: 
Re: Certifying sub-parts (was: LDraw.org 2004-03)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad
Date: 
Thu, 16 Sep 2004 03:31:11 GMT
Viewed: 
955 times
  
In lugnet.cad, Ross Crawford wrote:
But that reminds me of something I noticed recently. Quite some time ago, I
submitted the parts x170, x171, x172 and x173, which together make up
x170c01
http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/x170c01.dat

it seems 2 of the sub-parts have been certified, thus changing their
numbers to 170 and 171 respectively, while the other 3 remain un-certified.
This of course breaks x170c01, as it expects all the sub parts to have the
x prefix. I dunno the best way around this problem, but my suggestion would
be to not allow certification of parts if there is a complete assembly on
the tracker that includes them.

Yes, generally we would release files like this as a group.  But that is a
manual check, and it is possible to miss occasional items.

In the long term, it will work out alright -- we could resubmit x170c01.dat with
fixed references.  If we don't do that, if we certify the file as-is, the
ptrelease program will update the x170 and x171 references to 170 and 171.

Steve



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Certifying sub-parts (was: LDraw.org 2004-03)
 
(...) Yeah, I'm more worried about how much more difficult it becomes to certify, because reviewers need to modify all the references manually, and if they don't know to do that, they think it's broken and put a hold on it (like steffen). Is there (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Certifying sub-parts (was: LDraw.org 2004-03)
 
(...) Thanks Chris! But that reminds me of something I noticed recently. Quite some time ago, I submitted the parts x170, x171, x172 and x173, which together make up x170c01 (URL) the time it was decided they should all be in Parts, as they are all (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad)

10 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR