Subject:
|
Re: Certifying sub-parts (was: LDraw.org 2004-03)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Thu, 16 Sep 2004 03:41:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1090 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Steve Bliss wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Ross Crawford wrote:
> > But that reminds me of something I noticed recently. Quite some time ago, I
> > submitted the parts x170, x171, x172 and x173, which together make up
> > x170c01
> > http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/x170c01.dat
> >
> > it seems 2 of the sub-parts have been certified, thus changing their
> > numbers to 170 and 171 respectively, while the other 3 remain un-certified.
> > This of course breaks x170c01, as it expects all the sub parts to have the
> > x prefix. I dunno the best way around this problem, but my suggestion would
> > be to not allow certification of parts if there is a complete assembly on
> > the tracker that includes them.
>
> Yes, generally we would release files like this as a group. But that is a
> manual check, and it is possible to miss occasional items.
>
> In the long term, it will work out alright -- we could resubmit x170c01.dat with
> fixed references. If we don't do that, if we certify the file as-is, the
> ptrelease program will update the x170 and x171 references to 170 and 171.
Yeah, I'm more worried about how much more difficult it becomes to certify,
because reviewers need to modify all the references manually, and if they don't
know to do that, they think it's broken and put a hold on it (like steffen). Is
there any way where it displays dependencies it can check for an official no-x
version of the sub-part, and explain what needs to be done?
Maybe in this case I should resubmit the 170 & 171 parts?
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Certifying sub-parts (was: LDraw.org 2004-03)
|
| (...) We could, but I'd rather not; this is an exceptional case. In general circumstances, we'd consider x170c01.dat to be broken. It'd be nice if there was an easier way to tell the tracker about groups of files that need to be released together. (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Certifying sub-parts (was: LDraw.org 2004-03)
|
| (...) Yes, generally we would release files like this as a group. But that is a manual check, and it is possible to miss occasional items. In the long term, it will work out alright -- we could resubmit x170c01.dat with fixed references. If we don't (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
