 | | Re: BMP2DAT Re: Painted baseplates
|
|
Speaking about BMP2DAT - I am currently re-writing that program. So far, I've just made a slighly improved scan function, and eliminated the need of manual "vertical sync" adjustments. My wild plan is to integrate LDS, LDD, and BMP2DAT, so that you (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: BMP2DAT Re: Painted baseplates
|
|
(...) It's the nature of the beast. LDraw is very inefficient at storing raster images, which is what BMP2DAT utilities create. Steve (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: part 2951, more questions, nearly done [DAT]
|
|
(...) Fredrick mentioned part 6222, the 4x4 round brick. This part was done just before the hi-res primitives were established. If it had been created after the primitives, it surely would have been written to use them. (...) Definitely use the (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | How to submit parts for L-CAD Updates (was: new (unofficial) part - 4x6 flag - "41.dat")
|
|
(...) To submit a part for the next part library update, e-mail the partfile(s) to partsref@worldnet.att.net. Note for everyone: parts, subfiles, and primitives posted to lugnet.cad.dat.* are not automatically considered candidates for inclusion in (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part : Minifig Torso with Classic Space Logo
|
|
Not bad. Not bad at all! /Tore (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | BMP2DAT Re: Painted baseplates
|
|
(...) You reminded me of a question I had once before. I've used BMP2DAT a few times with success limited by my own ineptitude, but it always seems to generate really big DAT files. Am I doing something wrong, or is this the nature of the beast? (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Painted baseplates
|
|
(...) Depends on the pattern. If there was a pattern that always covered entire stud-tops, that wouldn't be too bad to make (considering that a 32x32 has 1024 studs to be painted). But I believe most painted plates have partial covering of studs. (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | E-X Dome (6958/6958 Combo Alternate) [DAT]
|
|
another alternate project (my second attempt at two 6958 sets). still not quite i had in mind...back to the drawing board. ---...--- 0 E-X Dome - 6958/6958 Combo Alternate 0 Name: EXDOME.DAT 0 Author: Joseph Gonzalez (c) 1999 0 Unofficial Model 0 1 (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | omicron outpost (2154 alternate) [DAT]
|
|
a little alternate model for the 2154 robo master set ---...--- 0 Omicron Beta SubStation - 2154 Robo Master Alternate 0 Name: OMICRON.DAT 0 Author: Joseph Gonzalez (c) 1999 0 Unofficial Model 0 1 0 70 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3022.DAT 1 0 -250 0 0 1 0 (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part : 1x2 Brick with Classic Space Logo [DAT]
|
|
Correction to small error in .mpd file - this one should show the gold on the logo. Chris (...) 0 FILE 3004p67.DAT 0 Brick 1 x 2 with Classic Space Logo Pattern 0 Name: 3004p67.DAT 0 Author: Chris Dee (chris_w_dee@hotmail.com) 0 Unofficial Element 1 (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part : Minifig Torso with Futuron Pattern [DAT]
|
|
In this part I have hard-coded the torso in white so the part colour controls the coloured detail on the torso. This allows the same part to be used for the Black/Blue/Red/Yellow versions. This is not without precedent, as the Town Dungarees Pattern (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part : Minifig Torso with Classic Space Logo [DAT]
|
|
LMKWYT - Chris 0 FILE 973p67.DAT 0 Minifig Torso with Classic Space Pattern 0 Name: 973p67.DAT 0 Author: Chris Dee (chris_w_dee@hotmail.com) 0 Unofficial Element 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\973s01.DAT 4 16 -19 32 10 19 32 10 19 29 10 -19 29 10 4 (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part : Space Nose with Classic Space Logo [DAT]
|
|
LMKWYT - Chris 0 FILE 2336p67.dat 0 Space Nose with Classic Space Logo Pattern 0 Name: 2336p67.dat 0 Author: Chris Dee (chris_w_dee@hotmail.com) 0 Unofficial Part 1 16 0 12 40 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 16 0 12 26 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 6 box5.dat 1 16 (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part : 2x3 Slope with Classic Space Logo [DAT]
|
|
LMKWYT - Chris 0 FILE 3298p67.dat 0 Slope Brick 33 3 x 2 with Classic Space Logo Pattern 0 Name: 3298p67.dat 0 Author: Chris Dee (chris_w_dee@hotmail.com) 0 Unofficial part 1 16 0 20 -10 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 stud4a.dat 1 16 0 4 -10 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part : 1x2 Brick with Classic Space Logo [DAT]
|
|
LMKWYT ..... and Jonathan don't expect future "challenges" to necessarily be answered so quickly - I just had some HTF spare time this week. 0 FILE 3004p67.DAT 0 Brick 1 x 2 with Classic Space Logo Pattern 0 Name: 3004p67.DAT 0 Author: Chris Dee (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: part 2951 [Off topic word usage]
|
|
(...) Yes, I think it is a hexadecagon too, but I thought I'd confirmed this in my dictionary once, but now it's not there ! Chris (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Making Ldraw Parts
|
|
(...) only (...) Yes the correction is needed. The first two point define the line, the last two are the reference points. Chris (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Making Ldraw Parts
|
|
(...) This made me go look at the FAQ, and I found the following inconsistencies in the FAQ. in Topic "LINE TYPES" we have (the FAQ has): (...) which I think its wrong in the line starting with "5: Draw ...." and further ahead in the FAQ (section (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw - Future Plans?
|
|
Alex: [asked] (...) [and explains] (...) Nothing prevents it, but it is not implemented in any program yet. I think we have discussed how it could be done at some point, and from the file format point of view, there is no problem (implementations is (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part 2951 [Off topic word usage]
|
|
Eric Hampusgård <purjo@hem.passagen.se> wrote in message news:Fo9tCB.FH2@lugnet.com... (...) A hexagon is 6-sided; I think a 16 sided polygon is a hexadecagon, but I'm not certain. -John Van (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
