 | | Re: What mailing list for Peeroml ?
|
|
Damien, I would appreciate if you don't put words in my mouth. (...) In my email to you I asked 3 things: - Rename the program to something else - from what I understand, there is nothing in your program that is Peeron specific - it's much more (...) (19 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: What mailing list for Peeroml ?
|
|
Hi again, People e-mail me questions about Peeroml. Considering i don't send the program and it can't be downloaded anywhere, politeness invites me to answer these questions here (as people privately asking are certainly reading this forum). (...) (...) (19 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: What mailing list for Peeroml ?
|
|
Hi Tim, Thanks for your comments. (...) I don't expect OCaml to spread like a virus, or being a popular scripting language. All that i have asked is a single homepage where people (eventually nobody) could have downloaded the whole thing. I didn't (...) (19 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What mailing list for Peeroml ?
|
|
(...) Hi Damien, I fear that even with Dan and Jennifer Bogers cooperation this project may not spread too far as most people are unlikely to learn a new language (especially one with such strange syntax as OCaml) just for database enquiries for (...) (19 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What mailing list for Peeroml ?
|
|
(...) Hi Clark Stephens, Thanks for your comments. You have well anticipated what has happened to me yesterday. At first i thought cooperation means: * function and datas should not be separated but available at a unique repository site (Peeron.com (...) (19 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: My humble opinion about LDraw animation
|
|
(...) IMHO there is no reason why someone can't invent something new. Especially as anything new would be still compatible with LDraw standards (otherwise the author would have to reinvent the wheel, the LDraw library and the existing Lego-Cad tools (...) (19 years ago, 17-Sep-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.animation)
|
| |
| | Re: My humble opinion about LDraw animation
|
|
Ok. So this is exactly the reason I didn't want anyone to invent a new animation scripting language for Legos! It is something new and is in danger of: being a sucky 1.0 release (or worse, never reaching 1.0), and not getting widespread use and so (...) (19 years ago, 17-Sep-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.animation)
|
| |
| | Re: What mailing list for Peeroml ?
|
|
(...) Damien, Please change the name of your program. Peeron is a trademark of Dan and Jennifer Boger. Your program is not associated with the Peeron site. The name you chose above has obvious similarities to the Peeron trademark, and may cause (...) (19 years ago, 17-Sep-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | What mailing list for Peeroml ?
|
|
Hi lego fans, I have finished the package and documentation for Peeroml, a scripting tool and programming framework for lego inventories. Its scripting language is OCaml (URL) Of course questions about Peeroml are off-topic on existing OCaml mailing (...) (19 years ago, 17-Sep-05, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Lsynth and control points
|
|
(...) You mean the hose end parts? They should be fine, but if you're talking about something else, I'm afraid I'm too ignorant to know what it is ;-) -NB (19 years ago, 16-Sep-05, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lsynth and control points
|
|
(...) It looks like I have lsynth 2.0 (had to start the installer to find out: no "about" or version number in lsynth.exe or readme :-( ), so I guess the fix you got hasn't been implemented yet. -NB (19 years ago, 16-Sep-05, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Help on custom kit in honor of Brian Kelley's son Joshua's life
|
|
Brian Kelley, who is having difficulty posting to LUGNET, asked me to post to LUGNET asking for assistance in creating a commemorative model to celebrate his late son Joshua's life. I did a quick search for a post from Brian regarding his son's (...) (19 years ago, 16-Sep-05, to lugnet.build, lugnet.castle, lugnet.people, lugnet.cad) !!
|
| |
| | L3PAO Install Problem
|
|
I've e-mailed the author and ldraw helpdesk. I haven't had a response yet and due to a time constraint, I'm posting here. The Portland State University lab uses Windows XP. When running L3PAO, it seems that the command line does not pass on to the (...) (19 years ago, 16-Sep-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Lsynth and control points
|
|
(...) I found a similar problem a while back, lsynth seemed to treat those hoses "not as bendy" as they actually are. I emailed kevin and he sent me an update that fixed the problem, I'm not sure if it has been released publically yet, but I'm sure (...) (19 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lsynth and control points
|
|
(...) Are you sure you have your constraints in order from beginning of host to end of hose? (...) (19 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Lsynth and control points
|
|
I have a problem with a moc, no matter how I try to place the control points, the hose make this 7-shaped form instead of a nice ?-shape. The hose is fairly flat in the y direction, so this picture should show the problem: (URL) I'm using Lsynth via (...) (19 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Help LDD won't Run
|
|
LDD does not recognize my WildCat II 5110 64MB card with a Microsoft cert driver. I run graphics programs all day long and this dinky program won't run. LDD 1.4 has a file called reqcheck.xml is there a way to hard code this file and make (...) (19 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: My humble opinion about LDraw animation
|
|
Hi James, whew - this is getting to be a big mail, but I will try and answer in situ... (...) I suppose I consider it part of the concept, so then I, or others can build what I built, although given the original LDraw file, some may be able to work (...) (19 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.animation)
|
| |
| | Re: LDD "hackers" made CNET
|
|
(...) Excellent question. We did get 2 rounds of answers but they weren't very "meaty". (...) I think as the article said, LEGO are constrained as to what they can say officially/publicly. But unofficially we're getting lots of winks, nods, thumbs (...) (19 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDD "hackers" made CNET
|
|
(...) Why isn't TLG giving this sort of feedback though the (URL) forum> it set up specifically for that? LEGO Factory has been out for three weeks, and the TLG reps have yet to provide any answers (other than "LDD will be improved in the future"). (...) (19 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
