 | | Re: Another LDDP plugin question.
|
|
(...) I'm not into sourceforge and I have no time to dig myself into it, but I can send my source to someone who is willing to try it in delphi 6. Niels (21 years ago, 8-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Another LDDP plugin question.
|
|
(...) Yeah, that's all I had to go on. I had the most trouble getting the exported function name decorations to match. Never did that before. Since all your DLLs seem to have the same symtom would you mind contributing the source for one (or more (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Another LDDP plugin question.
|
|
(...) For ldglite I've been emulating LEDIT, so that means the same position as the previous part, but unrotated. This works pretty well when you're building in LEDIT mode because it's right where you're working and it's easy to move it to someplace (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Another LDDP plugin question.
|
|
(...) What would the position and matrix be? I see two possibilities: Same position amd mtrix as previous part 0,0,0 and Indentity Matrix Of course we could add the ability for the user to choose between the two or input desired default position or (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New part - Castle Wall
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Bernd Broich wrote: < snip...> (...) I'd rather call it challenging :-)) But you are right. It shouldn't be our usuall way of working. It is sufficient for mock-ups and that was my first intention. Because result was pretty good I (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: A Plea from a greenhorn (Re: WOULD YOU PLEASE...)
|
|
(...) Ok, after this thread and some off Lugnet discussion, I've come to a firm opinion. I will refrain from ANY part modfications on non Official Library parts and then subsequent posting on the PT. I will modify parts and Email them to the authors (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Another LDDP plugin question.
|
|
I am using Delphi 3, which is (besides Delphi 1) the only version I've got. I haven't experienced writing DLLs before the LDDP plugins. The only info I had was the sample included with LDDP. Niels (21 years ago, 8-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Some secrets of MLCad revealed ...
|
|
(...) Unfortunatly this is not true with files that have synthesized hoses and cables. They are quite large and take a *very long* time to load. (...) Kevin (21 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Some secrets of MLCad revealed ...
|
|
(...) I guess points are shared only on a part basis, not on a model basis. So, 400 distinct points for a part is already a fair number. Thus I think the sorting technique I discuss is not candidate for implementation unless the ldraw library goes (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: WOULD YOU PLEASE...
|
|
(...) I strongly recommend to any part author to also register as a part reviewer. Then at least you can reply comments to votes on your own parts. I am sure you have been listened and your preferences regarding reviewer attitude will be taken into (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Another LDDP plugin question.
|
|
(...) Ok I fixed the problem in the ldlist plugin and replaced the zip file. Turns out I had to use the WINAPI convention and add an alias to the .def file to make LDDP happy. I wonder if it's a similar calling convention problem with the track and (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Another LDDP plugin question.
|
|
(...) I think he might have mentioned an older version of Delphi. Anyhow, I suspect it may be an issue with Delphi vs gcc. I got my ldlist wrapper plugin working in ldglite, but it doesn't work in LDDP. I added some debugging and saw LDDP call (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | A Plea from a greenhorn (Re: WOULD YOU PLEASE...)
|
|
(...) I agree, it is a little frustrating. I'm still a fledgeling author, and I need to learn what I'm doing wrong. Having somebody come through and make these edits before I get a chance to look is not making me a better author. I need to be able (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Another LDDP plugin question.
|
|
(...) I have no idea what the problem could be unless Niel used an older version of the plugin code. This shouldn't be an issue with Delphi. --Orion P.S. All the current developers at the LDDP project are using Delphi 6 or higher. As far as what (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Another LDDP plugin question.
|
|
I'm not sure what the problem is, but I'm running into memory problems with some of the LDDP plugins. I wonder if it's some sort of incompatibility with a particular version of Delphi used to build the plugins. Orion's plugins don't exhibit the (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New part - Castle Wall
|
|
(...) It's a little bit risky to make a part only from instruction scans. But never mind it's nearly correct. I'll send you a picture from the bottom. CU Bernd (21 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New part - Castle Wall
|
|
Dear All, I hit on an idea to build CAD model of Royal Knight's Castle from set 6090. In certain moment I found that one part from this set has been never created, so I decided to create it myself. It is a part 6055 named "Castle Wall 6 x 6 x 6 (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: WOULD YOU PLEASE...
|
|
(...) I can understand you. But I think primitives with are used by a lot of parts should be available to change by anyone. In the other hand a _part_ (or subpart) should never changed if it's on the PT. CU Bernd (21 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: WOULD YOU PLEASE...
|
|
(...) I agree that it affects every line in the part but my point is the triviality of the moving the part. If the origin is 1 LDU off of what it should be, it's fairly trivial to move it. -Orion (21 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99a
|
|
(...) Nah, that's not true. I've had teeth pulled -- it was easier than getting you to review! ;) Steve (21 years ago, 6-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
