 | | Re: 12 volt train track parts
|
|
(...) Owwwwwww! Also I would really like to see the blue 12V parts being made. Not only those, but then also all other 12V parts, like the rail contacts (box706) and so on. I made the diesel loc 723: (URL) had to cheat alot, since there are no (...) (21 years ago, 9-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: The dead Parts Tracker (was: Problem with account)
|
|
It's not dead yet! It's feeling better... (...) As of about half an hour ago. :) Well, mostly. (...) Mostly technical difficulties, and some availability issues. Steve (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker Status
|
|
Thanks, Steve!! -Tim (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Parts Tracker Status
|
|
The Parts Tracker is back online and open for business! The URL is the same as always, (URL). There are two outstanding issues that we'll hopefully be able to resolve soon: 1. Because of differences in the nature of the server, submissions and (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Who maintains the lugnet.cad section?
|
|
(...) -Orion (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Who maintains the lugnet.cad section?
|
|
I know that Jake M. maintains the lugnet.inst section but I am wondering you maintains the lugnet.cad section? I'll like to talk to that person(s) about some suggestions for our lugnet.cad section. Thanks, AHui A&M LWorks (URL) (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
|
(...) Yup! Soon! Not _exactly_ the way we brainstormed about it, but effectively the same result, I think. I don't think we'll go back automatically and retroactively convert news-posting accounts, for example. I think there'll be a transition (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | The dead Parts Tracker (was: Problem with account)
|
|
Do you guys have an estimate on when this will be working again? Is this an issue of technical difficulties, or are we waiting for someone to get back from vacation? And yes, I know this is all volunteer work. I greatly appreciate having this great (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | New part: Train Track Tappered Power Rail Straight [DAT]
|
|
Any suggestions on a better title, just let me know. This part uses the box3u2p primitive (don't think that primitive is certified yet). The metal parts are missing, I haven't started on that, yet. 0 Train Track Tappered Power Rail Straight 0 Name: (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Non proportional BOM in LPub
|
|
(...) Increase the min camera distance for part images to change their scale to better match the construction image. Kevin (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) I would be one of those who would be prevented from voting (at least this year), and I don't have a strong objection to not being able to vote. The restriction is designed to make the LSC a technical group voted on by technically involved (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) I personally feel the restriction is a good idea. However, playing devil's advocate, I feel obliged to point out that since it would increase my voting power (since I am eligible as a software author), it's in my best interests to be in favor (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: motm/sotm
|
|
(...) I agree somewhat, but I think it's better than having no contest in the mean time. -Tim (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | New SubPart - s/6309s01.dat : Duplo Tile 2 x 2 without Top Surface [DAT]
|
|
Without the parts tracker we are starting to get duplication of effort. For Thomas Garrison primarily, here is the subpart for the 2x2 Duplo Tile part, which I have been waiting to submit for some weeks. Chris 0 Duplo Tile 2 x 2 without Top Surface (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Non proportional BOM in LPub
|
|
When I generate Layouts this comes out: (URL) scale and proportions are out of bound here. I would expect the BOM to be smaller that the actual building step? Jaco "Jaco van der Molen" <jmolen@zonnet.nl> schreef in bericht (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Non proportional BOM in LPub
|
|
The new individual part images are other scales too, though I have set the minimum distance to 3000. (...) the (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Non proportional BOM in LPub
|
|
(...) That is what I mean... you need to erase your part cache when you change the (...) However I did that an nothing has changed... New images are made and new BOM's. Still the scale is like the images I posted earlier. Jaco (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Non proportional BOM in LPub
|
|
(...) If you are referring to the fact that some plates are not rendered at the same scale as others, you need to erase your part cache when you change the minimum distance for part image rendering. Kevin (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Non proportional BOM in LPub
|
|
(...) I guess you mean that the size of the parts in the BOM are not the same size as the parts in the construction image? Yes. This has to do with minimum distance. I've run into the problem, and don't know how to resolve scale between the (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Non proportional BOM in LPub
|
|
Hi all (and Kevin :-) I have rendered this (URL) using LPub from the car in set 1682. Great stuff, however the parts are non-proportional? Has this to do with the minimum distance again? Or else: what did I do wrong? Jaco (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
