| | Female Ldraw Parts
|
|
I've looked both in offical and unoffical parts but I can't seem to find them. Does anyone know if these pieces have been made. 1 - Minifig Hair Female (Like in the 4561 set) 1 - Minifig Hair2 Female (Like the one princess lias used in the Falcon (...) (23 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
|
| | Re: printed brick variants
|
|
(...) That's excellent work - looks like a catalog of my LDraw work to date, with plenty to keep me occupied in the future :-) Hope you don't mind a few comments to improve the completeness and accuracy. The category labels - p10, p20 would would (...) (23 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: Implicit face winding (was: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives)
|
|
(...) My bad- I guess I wasn't following the thread closely enough. (...) If I understand correctly, that doesn't really work for a huge percentage of parts. Parts will often have two surfaces in a row that both face away. Look at the breakdown of a (...) (23 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
| | Re: Implicit face winding (was: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives)
|
|
Tony Hafner wrote: > In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Kyle McDonald writes: >> >>Well I don't know that I thought it would be 'minimal' effort. I'll >>bet it would be a lot of work for parts that are already done. I >>did think that it wouldn't be that (...) (23 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
| | Re: printed brick variants
|
|
Tony, Answers below. (...) Those are exactly the kind of subtle variations that interested me when I started the page. I would appreciate pictures of any such print variations (including font, size, or color of print). (...) The vintage (before (...) (23 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Implicit face winding (was: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives)
|
|
(...) I recently went over some old primitives and brought them up to BFC certification. I found it very handy to have the flexibility of doing it whichever way had more "correct" surfaces. It wouldn't be so bad if Notepad had the ability to reverse (...) (23 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
| | Re: New Part: 3001p59.dat - Brick 2 x 4 with Shell text
|
|
(...) Hm, I've got at least 2 other versions of the white 2x3 with "police" printing in different fonts, plus a "police" 1x6 (or is it a 1x8?) And both varieties of 1x6 shell bricks I have use a different font from those as well. Looks like it's (...) (23 years ago, 11-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: New Part: 3001p59.dat - Brick 2 x 4 with Shell text
|
|
(...) Shell icon pattern ID (60). When I originally looked, 59 seemed like a good ID number. I don't remember my logic for picking it, though (perhaps because it *was* being used elsewhere). Perhaps the icon/text combination needs a distinct number (...) (23 years ago, 11-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
|
Hi Travis, (...) Well I don't know that I thought it would be 'minimal' effort. I'll bet it would be a lot of work for parts that are already done. I did think that it wouldn't be that bad for new parts, because I figured the author knows best what (...) (23 years ago, 11-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
|
(...) Despite being the author of a rendering program, I agree with this whole-heartedly. Each rendering program only has to get it right once, during the initial coding. If we make it easier for the program, but harder for part authors, the part (...) (23 years ago, 11-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|