 | | Re: Enhancement request - File dialogs
|
|
Good hint - thank you I was just about to forget about that ... just have to read the docs how to do it, but you are definitly right. Michael "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:GuE3I7.Fy4@lugnet.com... (...) (23 years ago, 11-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: review: Radeon 7000 for BrickDraw3D, low-end Mac
|
|
(...) Cool! If you can clearly show where you make the changes, I might be able to port this back into the other versions. I've never been all that happy with the rendering speed myself. You can see in the code where I tinkered a bit with display (...) (23 years ago, 11-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts as volumes (instead of surfaces)
|
|
(...) "marking up" would be better done by machine algorithm, and would encompass the Connection Point proposal at the same time. It would indeed yield a separate definition of the parts. A lot of high-end CAD programs read polygons (like we have) (...) (23 years ago, 11-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts as volumes (instead of surfaces)
|
|
(...) Maybe I'm missing a technical distinction, but it seems he used bounding boxes *for* collision detection, as opposed to using exact volumes. (...) True. My point was, marking up the LDraw part files for volume decomposition would either: a) Be (...) (23 years ago, 11-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Enhancement request - File dialogs
|
|
(...) Before you write one from scratch, try using the file save dialog to do directory selection. It's a common trick. The file save dialog has more features, including a pastein path bar, and you just check what's returned to make sure it's a (...) (23 years ago, 11-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | review: Radeon 7000 for BrickDraw3D, low-end Mac
|
|
Upgrading my stock Apple G3/233 with a Radeon 7000 gave BrickDraw3D an 85% speed improvement. In pure OpenGL mode the improvement is 60% over the existing OpenGL advantage. The 2002 ATI Retail Card Update worked on G3/233 with 9.1 but BrickDraw3D (...) (23 years ago, 11-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: Enhancement request - File dialogs
|
|
I'll take that into the wishlist. The dialog currently used is standard windows .. if I haven't overseen something that's all it can do. But generating a new one might not be so hard ... I'll have a look. Michael "Larry Pieniazek" (...) (23 years ago, 11-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 3001p59.dat - Brick 2 x 4 with Shell text
|
|
(...) I could contribute with quite a lot of printed parts, since I collect them! I'll see what I can do. /Tore (23 years ago, 11-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 3001p59.dat - Brick 2 x 4 with Shell text
|
|
Tony, Tore, The 2x4 shell brick came in set <set:325 Shell service station> . That's the rare European only one with the yellow doors. I also have that 2x4 Shell text brick, if you want more pictures/comparisons. Also, there is a single brick with 2 (...) (23 years ago, 11-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: "tangenting"
|
|
(...) more (...) hoses, (...) From here what you can do is calculate the angle you need, based on the difference of the endpoints and a inverse tangent funtion. Or you can calculate the angle automatically using Paul Easter's handy calculator ((URL) (...) (23 years ago, 11-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Han Solo "gunbelt" hips/legs (was "matching pattern numbers???")
|
|
Hello! Man... i like these! Nice work! Play well Carsten (23 years ago, 10-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 3001p59.dat - Brick 2 x 4 with Shell text
|
|
Found it. It's set #325. (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 3001p59.dat - Brick 2 x 4 with Shell text
|
|
I don't know yet. Have a look at: (URL) quick, before seller removes pic. Maybe we should make a difference between the Shell logo pattern and the Shell text pattern? I think so. Don't we have the same issue with Octan and maybe Esso, too? /Tore (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 3001p59.dat - Brick 2 x 4 with Shell text
|
|
(...) Hey, cool! What set did this come in? Note that the 1x6 with Shell text on the tracker right now hasn't been certified yet. From talking to Steve, it seems that "with Shell text" isn't the ideal name. I'm going to rename it to "with Shell (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: matching pattern numbers???
|
|
(...) Sure, send it on. Steve (23 years ago, 10-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | New Part: 3001p59.dat - Brick 2 x 4 with Shell text [DAT]
|
|
Just arrived to me from Denmark today. :o) /Tore 0 Brick 2 x 4 with Shell text 0 Name: 3001p59.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Unofficial Element 0 CMDLINE -c15 1 16 20 4 0 1 0 0 0 -5 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 16 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 -5 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 16 -20 (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: matching pattern numbers???
|
|
(...) That seems perfectly reasonable. (...) Cool! Thanks! :-) (...) [snip] (...) Very nicely done, sir! ;-) I've got some of the new (2002) 'figs, so would you mind if I give you more info for this list, or else use your info in a list of my own? (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts as volumes (instead of surfaces)
|
|
(...) Well, I can have a twisted mind sometimes. I know these moments when the best idea today, will just be plain stupid tomorrow. Thanks to Eric Olson for more precision: he used bounding boxes, not collisions. Also I still think, whereas higher (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Han Solo "gunbelt" hips/legs (was "matching pattern numbers???")
|
|
(...) As promised: Minifig Hips & Legs with SW Gunbelt Pattern (Complete) (URL) Hips with SW Gunbelt Pattern (URL) Leg Right with SW Gunbelt Pattern (URL) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Modeling String
|
|
(...) Incidentally, I have considered it. But so far I have concluded that the mathematics are too complicated for an analytical solution. And I am a bit tired of programming numerical optimalization.. Fredrik (23 years ago, 10-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
