 | | Re: LDRAW memorial image site
|
|
Is it just me, or does this sound like terrorism? "If my demands are not met....." Shame on those (relatively few) of you who insist on making our hobby and community less fun. Bryan Beckwith "soc" <reallysick_of_crap@...tmail.com> wrote in message (...) (23 years ago, 29-May-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: printable parts catalog
|
|
(...) Glad it works. I don't know why there are any .png's. All I did was hit the "save as web page" command in Word. To tell the truth I didn't notice, 'cause I was in a hurry at the time. If anybody notices a problem, let me know and I'll get on (...) (23 years ago, 29-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Macintosh LEGO CAD/LEGO Designer
|
|
I just wanted to chime in here. Virtual PC is a workable solution for using MLCad on a Mac. I have been using VPC 4.0 and MLCad 1.99 on a G3/400 PowerBook, and I find it useable (much better than VPC 2.1.3). It is not going to win any speed awards, (...) (23 years ago, 29-May-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.dacta)
|
| |
| | Re: New non-magnetic coupler design
|
|
I just wanted to say thanks for the kind words. The Technic axle is a #2 not a #3. I also considered using a 1/2-connector-peg-1/2-axle-peg piece too. I might revisit that idea when I run out of #2 axles. The steering piece thingy could be replaced (...) (23 years ago, 29-May-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New non-magnetic coupler design
|
|
(...) I love your truck design. I might suggest using an axle piece 1 size shorter than what is in your display, (a "2" instead of a "3", or similar) but otherwise I have no complaint. As for your other problem, I think it is the downside of running (...) (23 years ago, 28-May-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Modeled Tanks
|
|
I've posted some pics of Mechanzied Bricks German and Russian Tanks. (URL) (23 years ago, 28-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: June 2001 MOTM contest
|
|
(...) Well, if these two are created, I probably wouldn't be voting in the model-only contest. It sounds too much like work <G>. I vote for MOTM because there's nice eye-candy and it's fun. The model-only contest implies that I have to scrutinize (...) (23 years ago, 28-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back... (Clarified! )
|
|
(...) It does go rather far back, doesn't it??? That's before I ever even heard of Lugnet! (...) Yeah, that's exactly why I can't figure out what to make of all this, and why I generally don't directly participate in debates. Not because I don't (...) (23 years ago, 28-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: June 2001 MOTM contest
|
|
When I vote for MOTM, I consider both the rendering and the model. However, if there are enough POV gurus out there that can submit fairly good models with superb scenes, they could possibly take all votes away from people who make incredible models (...) (23 years ago, 28-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: June 2001 MOTM contest
|
|
"Terry K" <legoverse@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:GE0K6s.Ew@lugnet.com... (...) For an LDraw.org run contest, I would restrict entries to models which have been generated with DAT utilities. (...) I wouldn't restrict model entries to bare (...) (23 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: June 2001 MOTM contest
|
|
(...) But what would be an allowable entry in 'LDRAWn'? A bmp. output of the actual original LDraw? Or include outputs or screenshots of LDLite, MLCad, LDView, BlockCAD, and others? Perhaps restrict model entries to a basic rendered output available (...) (23 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: June 2001 MOTM contest
|
|
"Terry K" <legoverse@yahoo.com> skrev i meddelandet news:GDyo23.666@lugnet.com... (...) rendered. I mean, there are many modelers that maybe haven't mastered POVRay (or other renderers) yet, but might still have good models. MOTM is more and more (...) (23 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: *.lca to *.dat?
|
|
"Tore Eriksson" <tore.eriksson@mbox3...wipnet.se> skrev i meddelandet news:3B109B1F.725658...pnet.se... (...) How far did you get? Anything to share, I might give it a shot - it's just the kind of challenge I like (Yes, there are weird people in the (...) (23 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: *.lca to *.dat?
|
|
I tried to analyze a .lca on its binary stuff, but I gave up. It's just too complicted, and possibly compressed. It could work if TLC handed us the specifications for the file format, but why should they do that? LEGO Creator is, after all, a (...) (23 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | *.lca to *.dat?
|
|
Hi. Is there any way to turn LEGO Creator files (.lca) into .dat files or vise-versa? If so, i might try to import the battle driod into the program and see if lets me, but i have no way to convert the files. (23 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | June 2001 MOTM contest
|
|
That time again, A very interesting mix of entries. Vote now through the end of the month... (URL) Terry K -- (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw) !
|
| |
| | Re: Me again
|
|
2. Yes, I downloaded it and it looks promising. (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?)
|
|
I agree with Jon Palmer. Since he failed to put the desired newsgroup in FUT section, I've taken the liberty of doing it for him. This should apply to all discussions caused by soc's original post that obviously have gone off-topic. Travis Dickinson (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
