| | Re: Parts Request: Please Read
|
|
(...) I didn't have these part. I wait for the C3PO been available in France or Germany. As soon as I got this set, I will try to modelise the parts. I have modelised Technic panel #1 to #4, so I won't be difficult to modelise #5 and #6. On the (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
|
| | Re: Request: Hi-res 1-4ndis.dat
|
|
Yes. Thank you, Franklin. I just discovered that I missed the 2000-02 update...! :-o /Tore (...) -- Tore Eriksson Sweden ICQ: 76066510 LEGO: MOC++++ FS,SP,TO++ TC+ LS YB@m (24 years ago, 6-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
|
| | Re: Request: Hi-res 1-4ndis.dat [DAT]
|
|
(...) You mean this one? Franklin 0 Disc Negative 48 0.25 0 Name: 48\1-4ndis.dat 0 Author: Franklin W. Cain (fwcain@yahoo.com) 0 Official LCAD Primitive - 2000-02 Update 0 3 16 1 0 1 1 0 0 0.9914 0 0.1305 3 16 1 0 1 0.9914 0 0.1305 0.9659 0 0.2588 3 (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
|
| | Help with new part
|
|
I am trying to model the part shown in the picture. It shows the part that is in question. Does anyone have the part #? Any suggestions as to a name? Here is the link to the brickshelf picture: (URL) is the little red peg part on the white axle) If (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
|
| | Request: Hi-res 1-4ndis.dat
|
|
Anyone? (24 years ago, 6-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
|
| | Re: Would some one model these parts??
|
|
(...) Thanks. I just got done reviewing the LDraw giude. I'll be more carefull about posting. (24 years ago, 6-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Is any good ELL9X?
|
|
Does anyone still use ELL9X? the front-end made by me. Do I need to improve it? Any ideas, comments ? eduardo.harte@terra.es (URL) (24 years ago, 6-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
|
| | New Part: 3x 3x 2.5 Crane Basket [DAT]
|
|
I'm assuming this is a basket. I didn't know what else to call it. 0 Basket 3 x 3 x 2 & 1/2 Square 0 Name: 2424.dat 0 Author: Joseph H. Cardana 0 ROTATION CENTER -29.9865 6.02407 0 1 "Custom" 0 ROTATION CONFIG -1 1 1 16 -40 4 20 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 -1 (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Duplo Center Stud Primitive [DAT]
|
|
Here is the primitive for the Duplo center stud I came up with. It incorporates the flattened sections on the inner walls. 0 Stud 4 (Duplo) 0 Name: stud4dup.dat 0 Author: Don Rogerson 0 Unofficial Ldraw model 1 16 0 -40 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Duplo part 3437 (2x2) [DAT]
|
|
I've been working on Duplo parts myself. Here is my 2x2 brick. You will also need the primitive Stud4dup.dat (to follow), which is the primitive I devised for the center stud. It incorporates the flattened surfaces on the inside cylinder. For the (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: Colorized Images (was: Partsref Update)
|
|
(...) Further pulling this discussion on another tangent: Another of the new Duplo sets appears to come with trans-dark green Duplo train tracks. Unfortunately, it only has straights, so the Emerald City Express will have to run on a linear track. (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad)
|
|
| | Re: January LDraw MOTM Competition
|
|
I sent them - They are really easy for me to forward to anyone else. Rui Martins <Rui.Martins@link.pt> wrote in message news:Pine.GSU.4.10.1...0@is-sv... (...) your (...) see (...) it????? (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
|
| | Re: New Part: 3001_d.dat - Duplo Brick 2 x 4
|
|
(...) Ah, I forgot about primitive substitution. For that reason, we probably should have a special primitive for Duplo studs (as you previously did), not a scaled-up stud4.dat as I suggested (and as I used in my recent Duplo parts). On the specific (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: Would some one model these parts??
|
|
Austin, Since you haven't received any answers, and I think this is the third time you posted this or a nearly similar message in this forum (or one of the other CAD groups), it is probably safe to say that no one has modeled these yet, and also no (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: x475.dat, "Minifig Hat Tri-Corner"
|
|
(...) OK. I'll stick with my statement: the comment should only supply information about *placement*, not provide helpful suggestions about rotating the parts. Steve (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: New Part: 3001_d.dat - Duplo Brick 2 x 4 [DAT]
|
|
(...) Sorry, my mistake. I think someone suggested the change, and I must have taken it for an official decision. I have no idea who suggeted the name change, only that I didn't like it then, and I don't like it now. My 33062 looks like this: 0 (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: x475.dat, "Minifig Hat Tri-Corner"
|
|
(...) Addendum: This "default" is also the usual manner in which LegoCo illustrated their Pirates minifigs who wore this hat: no plume, and centered. In fact several were illustrated as wearing this hat with no plume and *reversed* (180 degrees). (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: x475.dat, "Minifig Hat Tri-Corner"
|
|
(...) Yes. I like to have my minifig pirates with their plumes to their left (i.e., "sinister", to borrow a term from heraldry), but someone else (who might be a member of the insidious right-handed conspiracy ;-) might want his minifig pirates to (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | New Part: 3437.dat- Duplo Brick 2 x 2 [DAT]
|
|
Here's my Duplo 2x2- I'd love some feedback. Note that the internal ribbing is quite different from the way that the Duplo 2x4 is done. You also need the primitive referenced here: (URL) your copy of this primitive as stud8.dat. That is likely the (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Updated (again) Part: 3011.dat - Duplo Brick 2 x 4 & discussion [DAT]
|
|
(...) I too have stud5.dat as the Scala stud. As I further cleaned up the 2x2 and 2x4, something else jumped out at me that I hadn't seen before because the part was further off in other areas. Tore's top stud looked good to me at first, but then as (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|