 | | Re: 3069p25.dat, now POV-RAY friendly! ;-)
|
|
(...) Done. (...) Done. (...) Done. (...) OK, but I left in "button" (singular). ;-) (...) Oops. :-( OK, I'm sending you the revised file in a separate email. I'll send the DAT file as an attachment, which, IIRC, is how you've said in the past that (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Working on new Parts Tracker
|
|
Hi, y'all! I wanted to let you know I'm working on a new Parts Tracker. So far, "working" consists of doing some basic analysis around required functionality and UI. And asking Dan Boger if he could/would lend a hand with design and implementation. (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: re-name "patterned" parts?...
|
|
(...) You realize you answered your own question? The spacing was inherited from James Jessiman, but it works better to have it there. If some programs/people don't want the spaces, it's easy enough to delete them. It would be more challenging to (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: re-name "patterned" parts?...
|
|
(...) This would do what you want, unless there was another, similar part, whose name is the same as the master part, except the final dimension included a fractional part, such as "... 2 & 1/3". Not that this is something that commonly collides (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldraw.organization (was: License revision 1)
|
|
(...) I agree with that because currently ldraw.org is working as l-cad.org, but l-cad.org will have to focus on other stuff as well. (...) I think it would be better to have the FAQ split, there should be a smaller FAQ with only questions that (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: What Happened to my Primitives?
|
|
(...) Sorry, bub. You'll have to reinstall ldraw.exe and complete.exe. See (URL) for links. Steve (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldraw.organization
|
|
I got my domain, www.kylekeppler.com, from www.namezero.com for free, yes FREE. They do put a huge ole banner on it and you have to have a site host so using it as your main website isn't that great of an idea. You do get unlimited email addresses (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldraw.organization
|
|
I got my domain, www.kylekeppler.com, from www.namezero.com for free, yes FREE. They do put a huge ole banner on it and you have to have a site host so using it as your main website isn't that great of an idea. You do get unlimited email addresses (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldraw.organization
|
|
(...) See (URL). Stick with www.ldraw.org for all our LCAD needs. "LDraw" should be the primary term for things LEGO CAD-ish, not just a reference to an obsolete program. Steve (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: 3069p25.dat, now POV-RAY friendly! ;-)
|
|
(...) Instead of these "Modified by" lines, please add comment lines like: 0 20001218 FWC Replaced pattern polygons with primitives and lines with quads 0 20001218 FWC Added keywords/category metacommands If you rewrote the entire pattern, and feel (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Colors
|
|
(...) Ah, yah. Look at (URL). Search for "dither". The dithering stuff is buried in question 20, under the sub-heading "Colours". The subheadings under question 20 should be included in the TOC, I think. And the bit about linetype 1's format should (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | 1789 Star Hawk II [DAT]
|
|
0 Name: 1789.DAT 0 Official Lego Model 1789 Star Hawk II, copyright 1995. 0 Stops at instruction steps 0 Unavailable Ldraw parts as of 12/2000: Preprinted helmet, two minifig heads 0 with microphone, 2x2 control panel with yellow/blue simulator (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets)
|
| |
| | Re: re-name "patterned" parts?...
|
|
Yup, that'd be why. ;-) Actually, those one-digit numbers are in reality *two*-digit numbers, prefaced with a zero, but since the zero in question is invisible, you don't see it. ;-) Franklin (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: re-name "patterned" parts?...
|
|
(...) My impression has been that the extra space preserves alphabetical listing by description, so that Brick 2 x 4 comes before Brick 2 x 10. Another gadfly, Dave! (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldraw.organization
|
|
(...) I registered leocad.org at www.domainmonger.com for $17/year. A guy from work registered a domain for $3/year but they add an annoying frame with ads, I don't think it's worth it but if you want I can get the address for you. Leonardo (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | New LeoCAD version
|
|
Hi, After a long time I decided to pack a new version for you, sorry for the long delay. Several fixes and a few new features, here's the list of changes: · Fixed rotation bug. · Fixed a bug when you insert a piece after a rotated piece wouldn't (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.leocad)
|
| |
| | Re: re-name "patterned" parts?...
|
|
(...) I'm guessing it's so they'll sort in human readable format... ie: brick 1 x 1 brick 1 x 2 brick 2 x 10 brick 2 x 12 would be instead (in computer numeralical order (as i like to call it when i complain to dan)) brick 1 x 1 brick 1 x 10 brick 1 (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: re-name "patterned" parts?...
|
|
(...) Because of parts like "baseplate 16 x 16" which need two character spaces? Without the padding you'd get ragged listings in monospace font reports. Just a guess, I am just a gadfly here. ++Lar (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: re-name "patterned" parts?...
|
|
(...) in addition.. something that I've been curious about.. why are the names (descriptions) in this format?: [type] <space> # <space> x <space> <space> # why the second space after the times sign? I've removed it from some of my updated parts, (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | re-name "patterned" parts?...
|
|
People, I've noticed a minor problem with the current way of naming/titling "petterned" parts. Here's a brief excerpt from PARTS.LST (sorted by Description): 3070.DAT Tile 1 x 1 2555.DAT Tile 1 x 1 with Clip 3070DISP.DAT Tile 1 x 1 with Computer (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
