 | | Re: Do we need public part submission information ?
|
|
(...) partsref@home.com (...) Thank you for submitting this important piece of information for us. I myself have several parts ready to submit. (Half of those ARE official, such as the 1980s solid minifig head and the Old 4 x 10 x 2/3 Car Base. (see (...) (24 years ago, 26-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | New renderings
|
|
Hi, I've just put up a couple of new renderings. One is of my icerat with some extra stuff: (URL) other, with permission, is of Ben Vaughan's ronin. (URL) plan to do more renderings, so stay tuned Thanks Jay (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: November LDraw MOTM competition
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) Terry K!!!! As I live and breathe! Long time no see... good to see that name on a post again. J (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Bug in L3PAO when path deleted/renamed
|
|
(...) sure, I can do that.. I've pretty much abandoned dealing with the .ini because so many people have complained about having to load LDAO to use my apps, but adding it in is no problem. J (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | 2-pt msg: "copy of DAT file?" / "feature for BrickShelf Gallery?"
|
|
(Please notice that this message has been cross-posted. Please direct any follow-ups, and change "Subject", accordingly.) I was surfing BrickShelf's Gallery, and I stumbled across this: "(URL) I don't know whose account/folder this is in, but (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Do we need public part submission information ?
|
|
Hello all, I've posted this message to the group CAD/Development/Orga...ions/LDraw before, but got no response there. I try it a bit higher in the hierargy, but set the follow-up back to cad.dev.org.ldraw, agreed ? I think we should put up a (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | November LDraw MOTM competition
|
|
Hi all, The November entries are available for viewing and voting at: (URL) that the only "rollover" entry is the one that requested I do so. If you wish for your previous entry to be re-entered, you must let me know by email. I will not be (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Hello
|
|
(...) Thanks a lot. I'll try to make it all work this weekend (you know, there is that pesty work-to-be-able-to-p...-the-bills thing) and post a first summary ASAP. Regards, Hakan (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Check my web
|
|
I just updated it after a long time. I added a new page about emulators :) (URL) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Check my web
|
|
I just updated it after a long time. I added a new page about emulators :) (URL) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 2x2 round tile with imperial logo
|
|
(...) Standard accepted practice in the parts authoring community is to *not* do this. That is, don't draw parts you don't actually have in front of you. That pic I posted is enough to tell that a part is "wrong" but not enough to tell that a part (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Bug in L3PAO when path deleted/renamed
|
|
(...) Now, once you've found it, can you write it to ldraw.ini, so everyone else can find it, too? (...) Heh. That wasn't bidding, not really. I don't think I raised anything more than once. Steve (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 2x2 round tile with imperial logo
|
|
(...) Actually, I'm drawing it from memory, which isn't working quite as well as I hoped it would (I've got the set that it's from, but it's in storage right now). I'm sure that if I had a part or a good close-up pic or scan that I could work from (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Interesting Octagon Shape [DAT]
|
|
Jamie (my 12yo son) discovered an interesting shape, using plate hinges. He built an octagonal shape, by putting hinge plates <part: 4275> and <part: 4276> onto a z-bracket <part: 6087>. He repeated this structure eight times, and fit it all (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.ideas)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 2x2 round tile with imperial logo
|
|
(...) Whoops, sorry about that! Well, I think it needs more work then. I can't find a really definitive picture, but if you look here: (URL) scroll to the roof view: (URL) will see that the black outer circle is significantly less than the tile (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Repost: 4150imp.dat
|
|
(...) <snip> I am not a parts author so I could be all wet, but I just checked this out, and I still see what appear to possibly be errors. 5 "spokes" appear to have "wide flat arrows" pointing out, but one does not. Is that correct? (I don't have (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Repost: 4150imp.dat [DAT]
|
|
Let's try this with the web poster (I swear, it didn't exist until Mr. Bliss mentioned it to me) 0 Tile 2 x 2 Round With Imperial Symbol 0 Name: 4150imp.dat 0 Unofficial part 0 Author: Matt Schild 2 24 0 8 2 4 8 6 2 24 4 8 6 6 8 4 2 24 6 8 4 2 8 0 2 (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 2x2 round tile with imperial logo
|
|
(...) have. Possibly, either that or it's the difficulty of putting a 6 sided design on a 16 sided surface and trying to make it look right. (...) call (...) at (...) *ahem* that is exactly what this part is <i>supposed</i> to be. *sigh* back to the (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 2x2 round tile with imperial logo
|
|
(...) I checked this part out, it looks distorted to me, is that due to the word wrap? I think the base color ring around the edge may be a good thing to have. Also, is anyone working on a decoration sort of similar to this one, I call it the (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
