 | | Do we need public part submission information ?
|
|
Hello all, I've posted this message to the group CAD/Development/Orga...ions/LDraw before, but got no response there. I try it a bit higher in the hierargy, but set the follow-up back to cad.dev.org.ldraw, agreed ? I think we should put up a (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | November LDraw MOTM competition
|
|
Hi all, The November entries are available for viewing and voting at: (URL) that the only "rollover" entry is the one that requested I do so. If you wish for your previous entry to be re-entered, you must let me know by email. I will not be (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Hello
|
|
(...) Thanks a lot. I'll try to make it all work this weekend (you know, there is that pesty work-to-be-able-to-p...-the-bills thing) and post a first summary ASAP. Regards, Hakan (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Check my web
|
|
I just updated it after a long time. I added a new page about emulators :) (URL) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Check my web
|
|
I just updated it after a long time. I added a new page about emulators :) (URL) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 2x2 round tile with imperial logo
|
|
(...) Standard accepted practice in the parts authoring community is to *not* do this. That is, don't draw parts you don't actually have in front of you. That pic I posted is enough to tell that a part is "wrong" but not enough to tell that a part (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Bug in L3PAO when path deleted/renamed
|
|
(...) Now, once you've found it, can you write it to ldraw.ini, so everyone else can find it, too? (...) Heh. That wasn't bidding, not really. I don't think I raised anything more than once. Steve (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 2x2 round tile with imperial logo
|
|
(...) Actually, I'm drawing it from memory, which isn't working quite as well as I hoped it would (I've got the set that it's from, but it's in storage right now). I'm sure that if I had a part or a good close-up pic or scan that I could work from (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Interesting Octagon Shape [DAT]
|
|
Jamie (my 12yo son) discovered an interesting shape, using plate hinges. He built an octagonal shape, by putting hinge plates <part: 4275> and <part: 4276> onto a z-bracket <part: 6087>. He repeated this structure eight times, and fit it all (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.ideas)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 2x2 round tile with imperial logo
|
|
(...) Whoops, sorry about that! Well, I think it needs more work then. I can't find a really definitive picture, but if you look here: (URL) scroll to the roof view: (URL) will see that the black outer circle is significantly less than the tile (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Repost: 4150imp.dat
|
|
(...) <snip> I am not a parts author so I could be all wet, but I just checked this out, and I still see what appear to possibly be errors. 5 "spokes" appear to have "wide flat arrows" pointing out, but one does not. Is that correct? (I don't have (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Repost: 4150imp.dat [DAT]
|
|
Let's try this with the web poster (I swear, it didn't exist until Mr. Bliss mentioned it to me) 0 Tile 2 x 2 Round With Imperial Symbol 0 Name: 4150imp.dat 0 Unofficial part 0 Author: Matt Schild 2 24 0 8 2 4 8 6 2 24 4 8 6 6 8 4 2 24 6 8 4 2 8 0 2 (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 2x2 round tile with imperial logo
|
|
(...) have. Possibly, either that or it's the difficulty of putting a 6 sided design on a 16 sided surface and trying to make it look right. (...) call (...) at (...) *ahem* that is exactly what this part is <i>supposed</i> to be. *sigh* back to the (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 2x2 round tile with imperial logo
|
|
(...) I checked this part out, it looks distorted to me, is that due to the word wrap? I think the base color ring around the edge may be a good thing to have. Also, is anyone working on a decoration sort of similar to this one, I call it the (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 2x2 round tile with imperial logo
|
|
(...) Oops. I forgot to mention the simple solution: post DAT files via LUGNET's web interface. The news-posting pages for the lugnet.cad.dat.* groups provide a simple Upload/Attach DAT File function, so you don't have to paste your DAT file into (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 2x2 round tile with imperial logo
|
|
(...) Forte's Free Agent. See (URL). Steve (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 2x2 round tile with imperial logo
|
|
Damnit. More word wrap. Can anyone reccomend a new newsreader? "Matt Schild" <phydeaux@sisna.com> wrote in message news:G2zF0G.B1M@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) versions), (...) 7 -1.65445 -0.4 -17.0077 -1.8786 -0.4 -18.1031 -9.19239 -0.4 -15.9217 (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part: 2x2 round tile with imperial logo [DAT]
|
|
This one sort of speaks for it's self. Yes, I know that it doesn't have the tiny grey ring at the very outside, but if you ask me, that's pretty much un-necessary. I've decided not to do the "han solo in carbonite" piece... I'm not that good. Up (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Can anyone tell me where to get a small UFO top saucer section?
|
|
(...) I dunno about the official release but here's the mock-up I use: (URL) still isn't correct though Greetz, Jay (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
