 | | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost)
|
|
(...) I got only one at the moment on my Lego page. Go to (URL) post some more when I get L3PAO working again. Now it just dies complaining about the wrong Comdlg32.ocx version. ---...--- -- <`) Axel (F.) Poque /V\ axel.pq@t-online.de powered by |_ (...) (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: LDAO Minifig Modeler
|
|
(...) Do you get any kind of error message? The newest LDAO shouldn't care what version of LDLite you're running. As long as you've gone into Options | Settings from the main window, and pointed at LDLite's location on the hard drive, you should be (...) (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw extended colors (for Paul Gyugyi)
|
|
Lars C. Hassing wrote in (URL) (snip) (...) Well, Paul, have you decided? (...) What do you think? /Lars (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Things for the next part update
|
|
(...) Yes all the examples seem to use uppercase, but it's never explicitly stated that it MUST be uppercase. The only thing I could find that came close was a mention in ledit.doc that said the ledit commands were documented in uppercase for (...) (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Things for the next part update
|
|
(...) Actually, I think it would be much less flexible if all cases were accepted for meta commands. That would seriously limit the kinds of comments one could write in a DAT file! Fredrik (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Things for the next part update
|
|
Michael Lachmann wrote... (...) I don't think it is unflexible, it's just a matter of syntax, like C keywords (if/for/while/switch...) MUST be in lowercase. /Lars (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Things for the next part update
|
|
(...) The FAQ ((URL) shows uppercase syntax, e.g.: <QUOTE-BEGIN> Step meta-command. Marks the end of a building step. Line format: 0 STEP This command will cause LDraw to stop until you press <enter>, and it will cause LDraw to save the current (...) (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Ideas for I-DEAS?
|
|
(...) I was checking out the SDRC website [1] and the Master Modeler is able to export an .STL file. I don't know any more than that though. Sorry, your on your own from here. :-) -Duane [1] (URL) (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Ideas for I-DEAS?
|
|
(...) the (...) there (...) wish (...) same (...) I took a week worth of training about two years ago and got laid off three months later, so I don't have much working experience. What would you like to know? I will answer if I can. -Duane (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Things for the next part update
|
|
(...) then (...) This caught me by surprise as well. Is this UPPERCASE thing written down anywhere besides this thread? A quick search of the ldraw FAQ and ldlite16.html turns up no occurances of the word "uppercase". If this is an unwritten rule (...) (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Castle Shield with Black Falcon Pattern
|
|
(...) Communicating with Michael privately, it looks like he has found the bug, and hopes to fix it in a future release. Chris (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Ideas for I-DEAS?
|
|
(...) If I-DEAS produces STL files, you can use STL2DAT. You will find it here (URL) Klein A Mindstorms fan. (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Results of rotation experiments
|
|
Hi, as I sayed in a previous posting, I tried to play arround with the rotations and the steps in MLCad. The general results where pretty good, rotating the grid with the orientation of the part is the best idea ever. I rotate the part over its (...) (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Things for the next part update
|
|
(...) <SNIP> (...) <SNIP> (...) Ok, if this is realy true means meta commands have to be UPPERCASE always, then I will update MLCad for the next release to accept only UPPERCASE commands. This would be realy no problem at all. It sounds a bit (...) (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost)
|
|
All I can say is WOW! That is one of the best models I have seen in a long time! You planing to make a command/service module to match :) (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost)
|
|
(...) Wow, that's huge! Unfortunately, it's hard to get the full effect with a DAT file this big. Do you plan on rendering any raytraces? I'm sure that with some nice pics, more people would comment. From what I can tell, though, it looks like (...) (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: 8880 Supercar Performance Upgrades
|
|
(...) LOL! I guess I wasn't paying attention to the original post... good thing I don't own a car... ;-) -Shiri (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 8880 Supercar Performance Upgrades
|
|
(...) First, it isn't real, it's a parody of aftermarket tuning for real cars... and if you hop around to some sites regarding that topic, I think you'll find that $6499.00 is a reasonable price for a complete twin-turbo kit :) J (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | LDAO Minifig Modeler
|
|
So, I've been away from all of this Lego modelling craziness for a while, but recently the bug bit me again,[1] and I started downloading all of the bits and setting up Virtual PC. I have LDraw and the latest updates, LDLite, LDAO, etc. installed (...) (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: 8880 Supercar Performance Upgrades
|
|
Is that price right? $6499? Or should that be, maybe, $64.99...? Just wondering, not criticizing, yah? I don't have a super-car, so I don't count anyhow ;-) -Shiri (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build, lugnet.technic)
|
