 | | Re: Website
|
|
(...) No problem :) I'm sure a lot of people will/have benefitted from your work. (...) Right now, I'm working as a Web designer... Sort of ID. I graduate in December, though. In the past ocuple of years, I've worked for an Architecture firm here in (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | which viewers are getting used?
|
|
Before I set up mime types for marsbase.com, I wanted to get an idea of where the comunity was in terms of which viewers were being used the most. That way, I can set it up for the largest audience. Well anyway, I set up a small web based survey to (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Website
|
|
(...) Augh, I knew you were in ID, I should have known you would know all about this stuff. Maybe someone else will benefit from the knowledge. (...) Yeah, multiple models are a pain--which is why for the older models on my site, there are only one (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Website
|
|
(...) Thanks. Wish I had the time...maybe if I do that senior project I'll need project ideas :) (...) Hey, it's the best way to learn :) (...) Aw, you're gonna make me blush ;) I hope I can find enough stuff to work on for 30 hours a week for 3 (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: 30358 nearly finished
|
|
(...) Ok, I'll see what I can do. Paul (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Website
|
|
(...) Thanks :) A little bit of constructive criticism on (...) Thanks, Bram. Although, I already new about this stuff. I work with Alias Studio on a daily basis, so I am very into rendering. The reason I went with straight defaults is that I was (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Website
|
|
(...) One might beg to differ. Your stuff looks much better than the majority of ours. In my perfect world, I could send you my MPDs and you'll return awesome renderings. :-, <SOUNDTRACK MODE="WEEPY-KITSCHY" INSTRUMENT="VIOLINS"> Alas, here in the (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: microfig aerospace fighter
|
|
(...) There's no concrete scale for microfig, if that's what you mean. I use two different (and pretty much arbitrary) scales myself -- 341:1 and 115:1. Your microfig models tend to be closer to the latter scale. Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: New minifig-scale anthromorphic lifter/loader
|
|
(...) color 16 or 24; thanks for catching this for me. Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Part request
|
|
About where is it on you todo list? Travis Dickinson (...) (25 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New minifig-scale anthromorphic lifter/loader
|
|
Please note some color problems with the claws when rendering this model in POV. See this article and be careful out there. (URL) (25 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Website
|
|
(...) As always, amazing models! A little bit of constructive criticism on raytracing (not that I'm an expert...[1]) Take, for example, this image: (URL) model is great, but I'd love to be able to see the detail better. Instead of moving the camera (...) (25 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: microfig aerospace fighter
|
|
Thanks! I think I might start to bocus more on microfig scale creations. Although, the things I build tend to be quite a bit bigger than yours. Is there something between micro and minifig? I think the official name for those parts is: V.ariable (...) (25 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Color problems in L3P
|
|
Chuck Sommerville wrote... (...) Well, like HAL 9000 had difficulties handling contradicting orders, POV apparently has too! The following extract from the model: (...) is converted by L3P to: #declare wl__claw_dot_dat = object { object { (...) (25 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: updated part: 971 minifig leg right [DAT]
|
|
The automatic .dat download from my original post doesn't work (oops!). So here it is again, this time only the relevant lines. Sorry... Axel Poqué 0 Minifig Leg Right 0 Name: 971.dat 0 Author: Steve Bliss 0 Modified by: Chris Dee (...) (25 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | updated part: 971 minifig leg right [DAT]
|
|
While I was rendering some pictures for my (yet to come) homepage, I discovered a little error in part #971. There seemed to be one polygon missing, so it was possible to see part of the hips through the leg when looking directly at the front side. (...) (25 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw CD-ROM Project
|
|
(...) Attention: Not all the people who have a PC have a CD writer ! Don't forget that. Also, don't forget the kids, there are still a lot of people who buy a pc for their children to play games, but the parents aren't interested in the pc. (...) I (...) (25 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Wheel Technic 20x30 DAT file wanted
|
|
(...) No, i'm looking for the OLD TECHNIC WHEELS as found in the following sets: 8850 (1990) 8853 (1988) 8865 (1990). These are the wheels with SOLID tires on it. The LEGO part number that's molded on the 'hub' is 4266, on the tire is twice '(C) (...) (25 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: DAT Explorer permanently online
|
|
(...) Ok, it's fixed for real now :) KL (25 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: DAT Explorer permanently online
|
|
Oops, not yet.... there appears to be a bug in the rendering system.... KL (...) (25 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
