 | | Re: Real Pics Of New Mecha —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | (...) Is it just me, or does this sound like thinly veiled condescension? If you put a large phallic cannon between the legs of your mecha, you shouldn't be surprised if people chuckle at it, regardless of their age. But that's ok if you think I'm (...) (24 years ago, 29-Aug-00, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Real Pics Of New Mecha —Terry Keller
|
| | | | | (...) seem (...) I must admit that, even at my age, I got a chuckle from it. It's just so noticeable there that it's hard not to laugh. But it is a good place to mount a weapon. (no pun intended) I was just curious about the type of ordnance used by (...) (24 years ago, 29-Aug-00, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Real Pics Of New Mecha —Mladen Pejic
|
| | | | | | Yeah, I guess it is pretty funny, regardless of age! ;-) Regarding the type of ammunition the weapon uses, well I usually like going for the direct kill, so, yeah lethal anti-infantry rounds, but it can also shoot anti-tank shells. BTW The 6 Yellow (...) (24 years ago, 29-Aug-00, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Real Pics Of New Mecha —Dan Simonson
|
| | | | | | BTW The 6 Yellow Missiles on the back are Tactical Nuclear (...) just light the battle field, it would blind it! ;-) Chef (24 years ago, 30-Aug-00, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Real Pics Of New Mecha —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | | | There are such things as low-yield nukes, which have a small blast range and are used on smaller targets. The US military has "man packs," so called because they can be carried in a backpack. They are of approximate strength that they can destroy a (...) (24 years ago, 30-Aug-00, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Real Pics Of New Mecha —Mladen Pejic
|
| | | | | | | Mark's is correct. And I specifically stated "Tactical" Nuclear Missiles, not things like the "H-Bomb" and etc. And I was kidding when I said that it would "light" the battlefield. Anyways, don't you think that the missiles would be to the advantage (...) (24 years ago, 30-Aug-00, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Real Pics Of New Mecha —Joel Jacobsen
|
| | | | | | | (...) Actually, I've heard the same thing but I believe it is actually the Russian Government that possessed such devices and subsequently lost them - along with numerous rumored caches of Russian military firearms allegedly hidden around North (...) (24 years ago, 30-Aug-00, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Real Pics Of New Mecha —Dan Simonson
|
| | | | | | (...) Sounds like something from Starship Troopers, if you've seen that movie ;-) (...) Actually, someone told me about those once. (...) Yup (...) Chef (24 years ago, 30-Aug-00, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Tactical nukes (was: Real Pics Of New Mecha) —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | | (...) They're in the book, too. Some of the MI had Y-racks on their backs from which they could lob several tac-nukes to either side. Heinlein doesn't specifically mention yield, but it's inferred that the lethal radius of the blast is well below (...) (24 years ago, 31-Aug-00, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Tactical nukes (was: Real Pics Of New Mecha) —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | | | | I can't speak for Tom in this matter, but I've heard that Spamnium is a pretty powerful explosive source. ^__^ ~M (24 years ago, 31-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Tactical nukes (was: Real Pics Of New Mecha) —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | | | | (...) We at Sproat Labs tried working with Spamnium (including its dirivatives Spamtomium, Spamitillium, and the dreaded Twice-Baked Spamcake), but it emitted so many bogon particles that we quickly exhausted our reserves of Fruitcake shielding... (...) (24 years ago, 31-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Tactical nukes (was: Real Pics Of New Mecha) —Mladen Pejic
|
| | | | | | | | LOL! Good ones, Mark and Jeremy! Hmmm... Here in my universe, Spamnium is too powerful for our reactors to bear... Just last week 12 colonies were whipped-out when one reactor went critical! Damn spam, wish we never even mined it! ;-) Mladen (...) (...) (24 years ago, 31-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Tactical nukes (was: Real Pics Of New Mecha) —James Powell
|
| | | | | | (...) Sure. Look at the USMC...they _issued_ (to the div. level) 1.5kt nukes, that were man portable. Only one little problem...the rocket propelling the nuke had a range of about 2km, and the radiation was lethal at about 2.5km... (...) @22 lbs (...) (24 years ago, 31-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Tactical nukes (was: Real Pics Of New Mecha) —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | | (...) LOL! "Military intelligence" hard at work. :-, In Starship Troopers (and Ogre/G.E.V.) anyway, this is addressed by the radiation suits the troops wore (as you later note). At some point in the book, when they need to penetrate an area (...) (24 years ago, 31-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Real Pics Of New Mecha —Nathan Falslev
|
| | | | (...) seem (...) Looks AND sounds can be decieving. (...) I don't mind a chuckle, but you wouldn't believe what a big deal some kids make out of it. I usually try to mount a weapon that looks nothing like IT. (...) I wasn't thinking your childish. (...) (24 years ago, 29-Aug-00, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Real Pics Of New Mecha —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | No problem. It was my own paranoia, I suppose. :^) ~Mark (24 years ago, 29-Aug-00, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | | |
