Subject:
|
Re: Updated my pages; new nanofig-scale starships
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build, lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Wed, 9 Feb 2000 16:33:48 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
JSPROAT@avoidspamIO.COM
|
Viewed:
|
816 times
|
| |
|
|
Patrick Justison wrote:
> Consistent use of engine design (cone in sw engine, or similar) except for the
> Embark-class Destroyer. It really makes the whole line of ships more connected.
Yah, the cone thing is supposed to be a coaxial aerospike engine -- as opposed
to a linear aerospike engine, which is what the VentureStar shuttle will use.
Unfortunately, I've never seen a coaxial aerospike design, so I'm not sure
what it'll look like.
I have a couple of smaller models with less sophisticated engine designs like
the Embark class, but the Embark class is the only one that made the final
cut.
> The Toho-class Battleship Insurmountable has a very 'Star Destroyer' look,
That was 100% completely subconcious. I was *done* building the thing when I
looked at it from a certain angle and started hearing the "Imperial March".
:-,
> Engine flaps on the Ogre-class Dreadnaught Warlock. I'm also planning on using
> flaps on future designs. A nod to Ken.
Yup. I've playing with putting a large flap between engines, a la the
Earthforce Omega-class Destroyer from B5, but it never looked good. Ken's
design, OTOH, looks awesome.
> Sideways steep slope pieces on the Warlock as well. Very cool looking! I use
> those in a ship that I'll post tomorrow [...]
Mmmmm, can't wait! :-,
Cheers,
- jsproat
--
Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@io.com> ~~~ http://www.io.com/~jsproat/
debug(this);
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
26 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
