 | | Re: star destroyer?
|
|
(...) Well, here in America bigger *is* better, and so I guess Lucas naturally fell into that trap trying to sell tickets;-) [1] (...) LOL And think of the amount of Mop N'Glow you'd need;-) (...) I agree. ST:TNG et al have thought through life in (...) (25 years ago, 30-Aug-99, to lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: star destroyer?
|
|
(...) Well, if *I* were Emperor, I'd need that space just to fit my Lego collection. Well, it wouldn't all be for Lego, but I would need a logistics base for the Lego-bearers, modelling slave droids, collection administrators, piece acquisition (...) (25 years ago, 30-Aug-99, to lugnet.build, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: star destroyer?
|
|
(...) Ah yes, that's right. That would allow for enough room to fit my minifig scale super star destroyer! Dave (25 years ago, 30-Aug-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer?
|
|
lol Sproat, consider this: Would it be less satisfying to play with Lego in the Holodeck than in real life? Is there something to actually possessing the material brick? An interesting question which for me actually has its roots in ldraw. I don't (...) (25 years ago, 30-Aug-99, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer?
|
|
(...) Wow. What a concept! I can see Riker and Data walking around Billund, Riker beaming over his Town Jr. set, and Data carring his minifig-scale Great Wall of China with one arm... How is playing with Lego on the holodeck less real than playing (...) (25 years ago, 30-Aug-99, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer?
|
|
(...) Man, that would be great!!! You could build any set even if you didn't have all the pieces you need, because the holodeck could create any pieces that you're missing! Wanna play with the original yellow castle for a while? "Computer: Load LEGO (...) (25 years ago, 30-Aug-99, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer?
|
|
(...) Yeah yeah, we would all be using the Lego holodeck as a waiting room, waiting for our turn in the Porno holodeck........ Gary Istok (25 years ago, 30-Aug-99, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer?
|
|
(...) Now, couple that with a replicator. :) "Computer, I want 200 2x2x3 corner slopes. Green" :) (...) Or you could load every castle set ever made and make a dozen kingdoms at war! :) (...) No, no, no. Ya got it wrong. Its "Computer: four million (...) (25 years ago, 30-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer?
|
|
(...) That is a *GREAT* fantasy. I know exactly what I would do with it: "Computer: Load CLSOTW site #1, then proceed through the CLSOTW list incrementally whenever I say 'next'. Increase scale to human. Then tell the Captain I'm busy." (: James (...) (25 years ago, 30-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer?
|
|
(...) You'd be stuck in Ed Boxer's castle for a month! And that's before you even see the cathedral! :-, And you wouldn't even see my site until long after the Web fad dies down. Firstist. ;-) Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 30-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer?
|
|
(...) You (...) the (...) Nah, I just want to climb the Great Oak Tree. ;) James (URL) (25 years ago, 30-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer?
|
|
(...) You (...) the (...) Is that a bad thing, though? I know I wouldn't mind being stuck in the best MOC in the universe for a month. (...) If I was the most evil person in the galaxy, I don't think I would be wanting to spend too much time in a (...) (25 years ago, 30-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer?
|
|
(...) Well, note that they also have replicators. Although the capain might get upset if he finds out you used the raw material for the next five years worth of meals to create a jillion train doors/windows... (...) Remember, they don't have money (...) (25 years ago, 30-Aug-99, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer?
|
|
(...) Only if the computer will violate patent, copyright, and other intellectual property laws. :( (...) Just wear thick shoes -- those studded decks can *hurt*! :) Steve -- More tiles! I must have more tiles! (25 years ago, 31-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer?
|
|
(...) I was thinking the same thing-- hopefully squishy bricks will be the rage by then;-) -John (...) (25 years ago, 31-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer?
|
|
(...) Boy, imagine the product liability lawsuits from people who tripped on the studs and did a face plant. Wonder if TLG could counter sue you for trademark infringement for displaying a permanent LEGO embossed in your face in reverse? (25 years ago, 31-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer?
|
|
On Mon, 30 Aug 1999 17:31:58 GMT, John Neal <johnneal@uswest.net> changed the subject (header): (...) I don't think I ever saw McCoy on the holodeck. Well, there was that proto-holodeck on the animated series... Steve (25 years ago, 31-Aug-99, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer?
|
|
Ah, but do you remember when *Scotty* went on the Holodeck to get drunk on "his" Enterprise and Picard joined him. Great show...:-) -John (...) (25 years ago, 31-Aug-99, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer?
|
|
(...) Some do, the Ferengi, for instance Gold Pressed Latinum....And I think it has Federation Credits as well (DS9) (25 years ago, 3-Sep-99, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
