To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.adventurersOpen lugnet.adventurers in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Adventurers / 2017
2016  |  2018
Subject: 
Re: Steamed Onions
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.adventurers
Date: 
Fri, 12 Nov 2004 20:52:25 GMT
Viewed: 
5032 times
  
In lugnet.adventurers, Niels Bugge wrote:
   In lugnet.adventurers, Kevin Heckel wrote:
  
   What about “Parts > 100 stud^3 = lame”?

Well, at that point, we may as well just make a “no BURPS” symbol. Which I couldn’t wear, because I can’t get enough of ‘em!

I thought you wanted it made shorter? Has “burps” some kind of lego connonation I’m not aware of or are we OT?

I mean Big Ugly Rock Pieces. And the equation works for me, btw.
  
  
   I can’t figure out how people have time for such neither, I’ve worked on a 90 stud ship for the last 70 days, and I don’t think that can be called neither finished nor capital. Of course it doesn’t help that I’m building it in MLCad; there’s a lot of “what the hey now-staring” at the screen involved in such a project. The 90 stud hoverbus I made in the spring took 150 hours over a couple of months.

Well, i guess it cuts down on gruschteling-and-tracking-down-part time.

That depends a lot on how well you’ve sorted your collection, but yes, rare parts, and parts you don’t have are of course easier to add digitally ;-)

Yes, I do need to get to that whole sorting ordeal one day..

  
   I never did use MLCAD much, I always wanted to use parts that weren’t rendered yet :P

Who knows, those parts can be modelled by now, so that’s not an excuse :-p

You got me there.
  
   The best part about it is that it’s a lame part that can never really be de-lamed. It’s a zeppelin, and zeppelin it will stay. Luckily, I like building ‘em.

The only de-laming that’s possible is the fact that the ones building successfully with them raises in our esteem, but that don’t rub off on the part. A lame part can never ever be de-lamed, that’s my opinion.

What if the lame part ends up being integral in a MOC trend? (Like the Pod craze, but those dome parts weren’t lame in the first place.)
  
   10x20 spaceship is right. Boat parts were used to good effect in this fine ship, the domes are salvageable, and I bet with a bit of pluck and a bit of schleim, somebody could make a turret through that dastardly window. I think it’s better that the castle wall is a lame space part, we wouldn’t want to let cap ship makers get lazy ;)

That ship looks slightly bigger than 10x20… If we’re going over that size, and into cap. ships then they can be ok but only for a few crazy bastards with too many bricks and too much time on their hands. But as TLC doesn’t seem to be particularly interested in that segment, it is lame for them to make such big parts.
I once build a big blimplike spaceship by putting two pirate ships together, but it wasn’t very swooshable and took up too much of the table. (and was too hard to separate = no play value)

You might be right about the cap’ers, but they would’ve made darn good containers without those arcane looking leaks. Now I’m stuck on octagonal containers which are harder to stack and can’t hold as much cargo.

Mmm, octagonal.
  
   I’m sure I’ve gotten more than 300 parts in a bag (mmm, corner slopes), you know, when I’m not getting trees or somesuch.

What kind of corner slopes?? I’m with you on the trees (although I won’t touch them sold by volume!!) the only slopes we got is those nice curved 1x6 ones in black and white.

Red 2x2 45 degree slope bricks. I got over a hundred. As for trees, I worked it out, and by volume (in a bag) I was able to beat the Shop at Home price on them by about 1/3, not including shipping (or gas to get to the outlet:P) The trick is to interlock the buggers. And, of course, fill the gaps with transparent red 1x1 tiles or something ghastly like that.
  
   What? New offer? So tempting... and yet I don’t have the money...

Oops I accidentally cut that part out of the last message: It is to fill one of the big basicboxes with 5 kg lego from the sets TLC can’t get rid of for $100. Sooo good but it also takes 4-5 hours to plunder the good pieces so time and money is a serious constraint, but still I have a hard time staying away; my Grandmother says I’m possessed, and she might be right, but at this point 5000 pieces is a serious boost to my collection (42,927 from sets + a couple of kg’s of extras, stolen stuff and the like)

Ooh. I will definitely have to ask about that. Maybe if I could plunder the pertinent bits of the Adventurers sets, I wouldn’t have to wait for onion domes in the mail...
  
Cheers NB

Kevin



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Steamed Onions
 
(...) Ahaa! (...) You mean... that you haven't sorted your lego?!! Right! OK, really: How have you sorted it? (...) Yes and we’re still waiting for someone to model those oniondomes... Somebody who really likes them - like you ;-) That’s always a (...) (20 years ago, 16-Nov-04, to lugnet.adventurers, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Steamed Onions
 
(...) I thought you wanted it made shorter? Has “burps” some kind of lego connonation I’m not aware of or are we OT? (...) That depends a lot on how well you’ve sorted your collection, but yes, rare parts, and parts you don’t have are of course (...) (20 years ago, 12-Nov-04, to lugnet.adventurers, FTX)

21 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR