Subject:
|
Re: Steamed Onions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.adventurers
|
Date:
|
Fri, 12 Nov 2004 18:37:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4974 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.adventurers, Kevin Heckel wrote:
|
|
What about Parts > 100 stud^3 = lame?
|
Well, at that point, we may as well just make a no BURPS symbol. Which I
couldnt wear, because I cant get enough of em!
|
I thought you wanted it made shorter?
Has burps some kind of lego connonation Im not aware of or are we OT?
|
|
I cant figure out how people have time for such neither, Ive worked on a
90 stud ship for the last 70 days, and I dont think that can be called
neither finished nor capital. Of course it doesnt help that Im building it
in MLCad; theres a lot of what the hey now-staring at the screen involved
in such a project. The 90 stud hoverbus I made in the spring took 150 hours
over a couple of months.
|
Well, i guess it cuts down on gruschteling-and-tracking-down-part time.
|
That depends a lot on how well youve sorted your collection, but yes, rare
parts, and parts you dont have are of course easier to add digitally ;-)
|
I never did use MLCAD much, I always wanted to use parts that werent rendered
yet :P
|
Who knows, those parts can be modelled by now, so thats not an excuse :-p
|
The best part about it is that its a lame part that can never really be
de-lamed. Its a zeppelin, and zeppelin it will stay. Luckily, I like
building em.
|
The only de-laming thats possible is the fact that the ones building
successfully with them raises in our esteem, but that dont rub off on the part.
A lame part can never ever be de-lamed, thats my opinion.
|
10x20 spaceship is right. Boat parts were used to good effect in
this fine ship, the domes are
salvageable, and I bet with a bit of pluck and a bit of schleim, somebody
could make a turret through that dastardly window. I think its better that
the castle wall is a lame space part, we wouldnt want to let cap ship makers
get lazy ;)
|
That ship looks slightly bigger than 10x20
If were going over that size, and
into cap. ships then they can be ok but only for a few crazy bastards with too
many bricks and too much time on their hands. But as TLC doesnt seem to be
particularly interested in that segment, it is lame for them to make such big
parts. I once build a big blimplike spaceship by putting two pirate ships
together, but it wasnt very swooshable and took up too much of the table. (and
was too hard to separate = no play value)
You might be right about the capers, but they wouldve made darn good
containers without those arcane looking leaks. Now Im stuck on octagonal
containers which are harder to stack and cant hold as much cargo.
|
Im sure Ive gotten more than 300 parts in a bag (mmm, corner slopes), you
know, when Im not getting trees or somesuch.
|
What kind of corner slopes?? Im with you on the trees (although I wont touch
them sold by volume!!) the only slopes we got is those nice curved 1x6 ones in
black and white.
|
What? New offer? So tempting...
and yet I dont have the money...
|
Oops I accidentally cut that part out of the last message: It is to fill one of
the big basicboxes with 5 kg lego from the sets TLC cant get rid of for $100.
Sooo good but it also takes 4-5 hours to plunder the good pieces so time and
money is a serious constraint, but still I have a hard time staying away; my
Grandmother says Im possessed, and she might be right, but at this point 5000
pieces is a serious boost to my collection (42,927 from sets + a couple of kgs
of extras, stolen stuff and the like)
Cheers NB
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: Steamed Onions
|
| (...) I mean Big Ugly (URL) Rock> Pieces. And the equation works for me, btw. (...) Yes, I do need to get to that whole sorting ordeal one day.. (...) You got me there. (...) What if the lame part ends up being integral in a MOC trend? (Like the Pod (...) (20 years ago, 12-Nov-04, to lugnet.adventurers, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Steamed Onions
|
| (...) Yeah, but I would imagine a techwest distillery to not have clean white tank thingies. Now if they were in chrome copper... (...) Well, at that point, we may as well just make a "no BURPS" symbol. Which I couldn't wear, because I can't get (...) (20 years ago, 9-Nov-04, to lugnet.adventurers, FTX)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|