 | | LUGNET members association
|
|
I move to form a new organization (not led by myself), that consists of members (if you aren't a member of LUGNET, what's the holdup?) of the LUGNET community. The association would govern the majority of the members needs, desires, problems, (...) (21 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions) !
|
| |
| | Re: Sugestions
|
|
You have an excellent point there. The off topic groups are an elegant solution to threads that wander away from Lego. What I find disappointing are threads that begin and end in .debate like this recent one: (URL)* And the fact that .debate alone (...) (21 years ago, 20-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Sugestions
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Peter Blencowe wrote: Some good thoughts--always nice to get fresh perspectives. (...) I'd be one of those who would disagree here. There are many times when something starts out as LEGO discussion but grows into something (...) (21 years ago, 20-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Sugestions
|
|
Well after reading some of last nights highlights I felt I just had to post something. Kevin Clague’s witty post has forced me to at least say something about the condition here on Lugnet. The truth is that these issues are destroying us. Imho the (...) (21 years ago, 20-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
|
(...) Hmm, some good thoughts. Can we move this discussion to lugnet.admin.suggestions, and could someone start a new thread there, capturing the discussion so far? Frank FUT: lugnet.admin.suggestions (21 years ago, 18-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Fwd: Request to streamline membership process
|
|
(...) You might want to inform your friend that membership is not required to post at Lugnet, simply enter your posting details here (URL) (21 years ago, 19-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Fwd: Request to streamline membership process
|
|
Hello, I recieved this email and I am posting it as I have been asked: Eric, Thanks for saying what you did here: (URL) One would think that Lugnet is about whining and bitching instead of about LEGO! Since you're a member, could you please ask (...) (21 years ago, 19-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | How to Spotlight (was: I resign from the LPRV committe)e
|
|
(...) How's about this: Instead of a 10 item list of spotlighted threads, why not two 5 (or however many) item lists? One of spotlighted MOCs, and the other spotlighted non-MOC topics. Shouldn't be too hard to code, and seems to solve the problem (...) (21 years ago, 19-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Request to move .mecha
|
|
Come on Dave, I don't want to argue. Please just leave me alone. e (21 years ago, 19-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Request to move .mecha
|
|
(...) Email also prevents miscommunication. It provides tangible proof that you've attempted to contact the admins without it appearing that there is a problem. As far as I can see, there is no problem, hence the need for a less inflamatory post (...) (21 years ago, 19-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Request to move .mecha
|
|
(...) Email goes unseen and hides inaction. I also should be able to ask hard questions without an agenda or some sort of desire to start trouble. I resent your insinuation that I am trying to start a flame war that is ridiculous. I'll simply wait (...) (21 years ago, 19-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Request to move .mecha
|
|
(...) Eric, I would ask that you sit tight and actually email the admins about this rather than provoke some sort of flame war. (...) I'm not going to touch this. I promised other people I wouldn't. Watch what you ask for Eric. It might hurt things (...) (21 years ago, 19-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
|
(...) Sure - but I thought technical development stuff belongs in .admin.general? Eventually, we'll really need an admin.dev though. (21 years ago, 18-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
|
(...) Hmm, some good thoughts. Can we move this discussion to lugnet.admin.suggestions, and could someone start a new thread there, capturing the discussion so far? Frank FUT: lugnet.admin.suggestions (21 years ago, 18-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | More Poll Options
|
|
I'd like to be able to create polls with sum and average options, to allow for the summation of counts and average of prices. Also, I'd like to be able to combine different poll types into the same poll. Dustin (21 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
|
In lugnet.general, Shaun Sullivan wrote: (snip) I've went through this whole thread tree up to as of just now, and added everything that I thought looked like a suggestion to our (URL) list>. If you think you made a suggestion in this thread or (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Town Building Contests (was Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?)
|
|
Bruce Hietbrink wrote in message ... (...) Those were my responsibility, and I stopped mainly because there seemed to be so many contests going that there were now *too many*. The town contest pages still exist (yes, they are LUGNET member pages :) (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Categorical Spotlights
|
|
Suggestion: In addition to "Spotlight", provide an "Agree" rank (other potential candidates include "Cool", "Informative", "Funny") for members to rate posts on. I think I've mentioned this before, but I don't see it on the suggestion list, and I (...) (21 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions) !
|
| |
| | Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
|
(...) Very good points here. Lugnet has much greater functionality built in than is routinely used. In part this is due to user inaction, but in part this is also due (IMO) to the invisibilty of the functionality. For instance, there is no easy way (...) (21 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX) !
|
