 | | Re: Request to move .mecha
|
|
(...) make it so, number one! sounds like an excellent idea. i think there should also be a "sci-fi" category to replace space and mecha since those themes follow under that category. either way, it makes no difference to me. (21 years ago, 14-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Request to move .mecha
|
|
(...) I second the above statement and endorse it fully. I would also ask any and all members of the Mecha Building communinty, aka, newsgroup readers to lend their support by posting along to this message thread. The only other issue I would like (...) (21 years ago, 14-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Request to move .mecha
|
|
We (the curators of .mecha, Mark Neumann and Eric Sophie) have been talking for a while amongst ourselves about moving .mecha to a location that makes it easier to find mecha related stuff on Lugnet. I am formally requesting that .mecha be moved (...) (21 years ago, 14-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: Request for New Selling Group
|
|
The market sub hierarchy has been a more confusing part of the overall hierarchy than most sub hierarchies, has been for years.... The following are personal thoughts, just to be clear. (...) I seem to recall that there has always been some (...) (21 years ago, 7-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Request for New Selling Group
|
|
(...) I agree. I thought that BST was for direct person-to-person transactions. Lugnet created a specific group for brickshops to remove the BL ads from the old fashioned classified type ads. That kind of division is in effect for eBay auctions. (...) (21 years ago, 7-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.market.brickshops)
|
| |
| | Request for New Selling Group
|
|
Once upon a time before Bricklink existed the buy/sell group was for listing actual items to buy or sell. Now it seems it is mostly filled with ads for Bricklink shops. Can we get an actual selling group again or a new group for ads of the shops? (...) (21 years ago, 6-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Suspend me as well (was Susp. of Chris and Terry).
|
|
(...) Lenny, Why is he so unpopular? If it is due to his poor interpersonal skills, why not have him do the behind the scenes stuff? Scott A (21 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Request for .vignette group
|
|
(...) I love them, and what is being presented is outstanding. Raises vignette.... errr hand. Janey "Red Brick" (21 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Request for .vignette group
|
|
(...) All in favor...AYE! Ken (21 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Censorship (was Re: Bye, bye LUGNET)
|
|
(...) I can only speak to the ease of implementation, but I believe it should be pretty simple. Maybe 3-4 files that will need to be edited, assuming we don't get fancy and allow custom filter-word-lists. (21 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Censorship (was Re: Bye, bye LUGNET)
|
|
(...) I agree that a language filter is a valid approch to this issue as long as the original, unfiltered post is available and, much like the skip filter now, the language filter is a user settable option (i.e. on by default but off if the user (...) (21 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Censorship (was Re: Bye, bye LUGNET)
|
|
Forgot to answer this portion in previous post... (...) I think we'd all agree the current process is inherently inefficient and completely human-driven, and appears somewhat arbitrary. Nobody is arguing that something far better needs to be (...) (21 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Request for .vignette group
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Nelson Yrizarry wrote: <snip> (...) I second this motion... (21 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Request for .vignette group
|
|
(...) It has been a little over 4 months now since my initial post on the topic, and I am following up. Personally, I think vignettes have proven their staying power, and that the number of posts and MOCs have increased, not diminished. Therefore, I (...) (21 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Posting setup (was Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
(...) I do to. I wish I had the time and inclination to write an NNTP client that would post via the web (it should be quite feasible). It would of course have to fill in the Lugnet login form for you to get the cookie (or figure out how to "borrow" (...) (21 years ago, 21-Feb-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: leaving LUGNET
|
|
(...) AFAIK, yes. When you just set the page to a blank, it IS just another version. The older version would be availalbe for everyone to see with some arcane syntax. (21 years ago, 5-Feb-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: leaving LUGNET
|
|
(...) I only said it was rude and *arguably* had legal implications. That is still my opinion. I doubt I would personally even investigate legal action if my pages were restored after I deleted them, but it would certainly sour my taste of Lugnet. (...) (21 years ago, 5-Feb-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: leaving LUGNET
|
|
(...) Again, I'm not saying that Lugnet really shouldn't remove data if someone asks. But if there's going to be an easily accessible system, I'd prefer "hide" over "remove". If there's a court order, or someone really does specify that they want (...) (21 years ago, 5-Feb-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: leaving LUGNET
|
|
(...) But see also the ToS, point 7: - start - 7. By posting messages, uploading files, inputting data, or engaging in any other form of communication through this service, you are granting LUGNET and its owners a perpetual, irrevocable, royalty- (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: leaving LUGNET
|
|
(...) Of course does anyone actually support a NNTP server feed off of Lugnet (as opposed to individual reads which only get posts that you are actually interested in)? On the other hand, a cancel DOES NOT delete the post, it just removes it from (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
