 | | Re: Smiley Icons?
|
|
"Mark Riley" <markril@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:I5L9yz.19GL@lugnet.com... (...) sure (...) we (...) "cheese" (...) the (...) I'm using a normal (MS Outlook Express) news reader to read and write post on lugnet. So those smileys would just (...) (22 years ago, 16-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Smiley Icons?
|
|
(...) Thanks Jan-Albert, for mentioning Lowlug :-D However, originally these smilies come from (URL) :-) I thought I'd mention it. I think implementing smilies would be a very nice feature, and these minifigsmilies are just very cool! Saskia (...) (22 years ago, 17-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Smiley Icons?
|
|
Mark Riley wrote in message ... (...) we (...) "cheese" (...) the (...) As long as they don't mess up NNTP any more than misused FTX already does, and we can turn 'em off for the web interface, fine. But as Larry says, there are higher priority (...) (22 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Smiley Icons?
|
|
Good idea; this place needs more (URL) . Scott A (22 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Smiley Icons?
|
|
(...) I'd like to speak out against it, or at best state that it ought to be low priority. At least until and unless there is a far wider base of coding talent that's contributing to LUGNET development. Two reasons I think there are a number of much (...) (22 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Smiley Icons?
|
|
(...) Yeah, heheh, the smile on that head looks more like a smirk. But, like I said, it was just a quick hack! :-) Mark (22 years ago, 14-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Smiley Icons?
|
|
(...) Actually, check here for smileys: (URL) (22 years ago, 14-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Smiley Icons?
|
|
(...) If this type of minifig head emoticon would be implimented, then maybe Janey R B would FINALLY use smilely faces!! Or in her case, using more of the sarcastic face may be appropriate (wink). Bob (22 years ago, 14-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Smiley Icons?
|
|
(...) Check out (URL) for many minifig smilies However, I hope this won't mess up the NNTP service, as I still refuse to convert to web-based posting (22 years ago, 14-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Smiley Icons?
|
|
OK, doh! After composing this, I just did a search on "emoticons" and sure enough, this was (URL) discussed> a while ago. What ever happened to it? Hi All, Smiley icons seem to be all the rage on many other forums on the net, but we don't have any (...) (22 years ago, 14-Oct-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Mark Papenfuss wrote: <snip> (...) Wow. And I thought I was arrogant. ;) Dave K (22 years ago, 1-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
|
(...) quite amazing how this is revolving around how a lugnet admin actually did not ignore you, replied to your postm, and made you feel like a responsible person of society, and you blew up at him and judged his intelligence to that of a (...) (22 years ago, 1-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
|
(...) lol, whatever Todd. Look - everybody has brain farts - Leonard just happend to have a very large one here (I assume). I am not, and did not say he is like that in general - just on that one point. There is a difference between these: But my 3 (...) (22 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
|
(...) That was really a not cool thing of you to just say. (...) The extent to which any given group is "on-topic" (e.g., LEGO-focused) or "off-topic" (e.g., non-LEGO) is not a 0 or 1 but a fuzzy value in-between. For example, many posts in the .loc (...) (22 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
|
(...) good ;) But that is not what you said I was asking for. So I am glad it is NOW yes, but I don't think it is "still yes". (...) I am sorry you took that as disrespectful. It was not the intention. More on this below (1). (...) See, I would (...) (22 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
|
(...) Yup. I heard you say that loud and clear. (...) Still yes. (...) It shows disrespect to post a direct reply to a random and innocent message in a group when you think that the group itself is misplaced, and not the message. It also shows (...) (22 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Larry Pieniazek wrote: (snip) (...) I just wanted to drive home my point one more time before I leave this topic. I see a definite distinction between LUGNET the LEGO resource and LUGNET the AFOL community. That's not to (...) (22 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
(...) Yes. (...) Thank you, Lar. JOHN (22 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
(...) This seems like a good summary of your position on this topic. Do you agree? If not, is there a better one? Is there anything significant on this proposed change that you feel hasn't been brought to light yet? If this is a good summary and (...) (22 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
|
(...) Yes it was misplaced. I was not in the wrong - and Leonard's refusal to comprehend is where the problem started, not with me. (...) WRONG. 100% WRONG Todd. Really, what is hard to understand about what I am saying. Let me pull a quote: "the (...) (22 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
