Subject:
|
Re: Why these news groups were created
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:32:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5879 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
(snip)
| |
Is there anything significant on this proposed
change that you feel hasn’t been brought to light yet?
|
I just wanted to drive home my point one more time before I leave this topic.
I see a definite distinction between LUGNET the LEGO resource and LUGNET the
AFOL community. That’s not to say that the two don’t overlap, but they don’t
overlap completely. I think there is great value in keeping LUGNET the LEGO
resource all about LEGO, such as a Brickshelf or a Peeron (and I would include
all of the on-topic groups as a LEGO resource). And I also think that there is
great value in fostering an AFOL community that has nothing to do with LEGO
except for the fact that it is what brought the community together in the first
place. I believe that the best way to cultivate and promote both is to allow
them to coexist separately so that they don’t interfere with each other.
LUGNET is growing. I think that now is the time to take measures to insure that
it remains a valuable resource for everyone well into the future.
There. I’m done:-)
JOHN
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
| (...) This seems like a good summary of your position on this topic. Do you agree? If not, is there a better one? Is there anything significant on this proposed change that you feel hasn't been brought to light yet? If this is a good summary and (...) (20 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
151 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
