 | | Re: E-Mail Confirmations Working?
|
|
(...) I didn't get a confirmation email to my test post (interface) just now, but more than that, I haven't received any posts by email from the groups to which I subscribe since sometime yesterday. Should I unsubscribe so I don't get a huge batch (...) (23 years ago, 25-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | E-Mail Confirmations Working?
|
|
Is anyone else having problems posting via NNTP? I can post (according to my news reader) but never receive the confirmation e-mails from the LUGNET server. It was working fine earlier today. Mike - mike_walsh at mindspring dot com (23 years ago, 25-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Authentication: does anyone say NO or MAYBE?
|
|
(...) I know I used the second option, several times... As for the third, I would hope that if someone does click it, all sorts of alarms will go off... The fourth option is a nice idea, kind of an online "outbox" - but I think it's more of a (...) (23 years ago, 7-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Authentication: does anyone say NO or MAYBE?
|
|
Just curious. When faced with the 4-way choice: * Yes I wrote it and I want to post it * Yes I wrote it but no I don't want to post it * No I didn't write it * Maybe I want to think about it what proportion of people actually select one of the (...) (23 years ago, 7-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Message CANCEL feature may not be working.
|
|
The Message cancel feature may not be working. I posted the following message via HTTP and then sent a cancel message via NNTP. I received the cofirm email so I cancelled using the web interface link. It will not let me do this a second time telling (...) (23 years ago, 6-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Some exciting things are happening!
|
|
(...) The new official channel is under a 'lego' heading: (URL) as the official channel for LEGO Direct is: (URL) discussion of LEGO Dacta products remains located here: (URL) line with things like LEGO Duplo: (URL) not to say it isn't still a bit (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Some exciting things are happening!
|
|
(...) suggests to me that it is for general discussion of DACTA rather than something like the .lego-direct group. I would expect you would call it .dacta-direct or .pitsco or something, to distinguish it from the product. Also, do your rules about (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: August Surprise...
|
|
(...) Sorry about that! Not sure exactly why the duplicate post blocker wasn't working. I was posting from an airport payphone booth while waiting for my email to finish syncronising so I could get back in the Southwest cattle call line.(1) The (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jul-01, to lugnet.events.brickfest, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Thank you, Thank you, Thank you
|
|
"r2" <lego@r2eng.com> skrev i meddelandet news:GFGFt9.Hq@lugnet.com... (...) I Agree completely! Thank you, Todd! -- Anders Isaksson, Sweden BlockCAD: (2 URLs) (23 years ago, 26-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Thank you, Thank you, Thank you
|
|
I agree - This is MUCH easier! r2 <lego@r2eng.com> wrote in message news:GFGFt9.Hq@lugnet.com... (...) been (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | x-http header?
|
|
hey, just an idea... when you get news-by-mail, there's an x-http header (or something similar), that will give you the url to the same message in the web interface... useful when you want to rate a message you just read. Is it possible to add that (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Thank you, Thank you, Thank you
|
|
Thank you for the new version of the posting verification. I received an email, promptly , sent my reply and my message was posted within a minute. It works great!!!!!! I can easily tolerate this painless extra step for us newsreader users. I seemed (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Are that many people really glad about the security stuff?
|
|
(...) You've expressed that opinion several times now and I don't see it as having been justified yet. I understand you have dark forebodings, etc. but I'm not sure I agree. This mechanism will keep out spoofers. It is not designed to stop all (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | E-Mail Authentication Error? (Was: Find your Birthday Buddy)
|
|
Todd, I replied to the authentication e-mail message on this one with an 'x' in the (...) option, and it seems to have been posted anyway. FYI. I realized that I had replied to all instead of where the follow ups were set to, so I changed my mind (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Email Authentication - Why not make it optional?
|
|
I see this now works. Let me thank you Todd & Co. Work much easier. Sonnich Sonnich Jensen <sonnich@hot.ee> wrote in message news:GFAL9v.6qo@lugnet.com... (...) on (...) program. (...) generated (...) 2 (...) time (...) use. (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A possible enhancement idea
|
|
(...) Thanks for listening and working so diligently to improve this great website. John Hansen (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Well done, Todd!
|
|
Just tried out the new email confirmation, and I'm impressed! Well done! ROSCO (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Are that many people really glad about the security stuff?
|
|
(...) I have a feeling we'll find that it won't keep the really persistent trolls out, but we'll see. ROSCO (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Are that many people really glad about the security stuff?
|
|
In lugnet.general, Peter McLoone asked these things: (...) Glad - absolutely. (...) Yes, it really is. Overdue, perhaps, but good things take time. (...) Yes, it is. It is a regular annoyance and inconvenience to us now, but after a while, we will (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Email Authentication - Why not make it optional?
|
|
Daniel Crichton <danielc@helio.co.uk> wrote in message news:GF8M7o.L2y@lugnet.com... (...) more (...) there's (...) Lugnet (...) I would also really like this solution, even though I am NOT a paid up lugnet member. If everyone still had access via (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general)
|
