 | | Re: Open Source Lego
|
|
(...) In the same way that operating a Customer Service Department or releasing new desirable products is part of a marketing strategy, right? So if you read "pure" non-spin information from a TLC employee, while it might not be "marketing" per se, (...) (24 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: A letter to Todd
|
|
(...) Not much of an apology. I hear all sorts of nonsense on TV. However, I have to sense to know what is on TV is not necessarily right or wrong. Basically, I rely on my own (corrupt?) values to let me know what is right or wrong - not TV. Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
|
|
"John Hansen" <JohnBinder@aol.com> wrote in message news:GAIqxs.73o@lugnet.com... (...) content (...) official (...) Content (...) Really? So you put just as much value in an article that is published in the Ridgemont High Student Newspaper as the (...) (24 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Reducing the level of chatter in lugnet.lego.direct
|
|
(...) ?? Suppose I posted a question about Castle which, to quote Todd's post #6 above, raised "Issues/concerns/suggestions which haven't yet been raised" ? The resulting thread, although about Castle, would of course live in .lego.direct. I think (...) (24 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: A letter to Todd
|
|
In lugnet.admin.nntp, Todd Lehman writes: <snip> (...) hehe, a little more than I was looking for. But it did make me smile :) I do see what you are getting at (and no, I am not taking that comment seriously) (...) <snip> (...) I think that is up to (...) (24 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Reducing the level of chatter in lugnet.lego.direct
|
|
Holy cow! I kept this message open on my desktop since it first appeared so that I could think about it and then remember to reply to it. It was message 317 in this group. The latest now is 680! Brutal. Anyhoo... (...) Todd, I agree 100% that the (...) (24 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: A letter to Todd
|
|
(...) No, it's completely outside of my abilities. Moreover, I'm too much of a jerk and a loser ever to say that...much less to mean it. (...) "Nice try" is my most-polite-as-possible response to what was an all-too- obvious attempt at (...) (24 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: A letter to Todd
|
|
(...) Hmm...why does there always have to be a why to everything? (That's a philosophical question, not a blunt retort.) (...) Weren't established with that in mind, and still aren't. To put it another way, if all these groups were just now being (...) (24 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
|
|
(...) An official post requires a certain stationary (aka email address domain) and a particular signature with specific elements in it. Have I understood you correctly? Is this actually documented anywhere? This would seem to suggest that lacking a (...) (24 years ago, 20-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: remove lugnet.dear-lego, or clarify its purpose
|
|
(...) I have. I posted several articles on that thread. See the results of this search to see them: (URL) William R Ward hermit@bayview.com (URL) are my principles. If you don't like them I have others."-Groucho Marx (24 years ago, 20-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
