Subject:
|
Re: Proposal: remove lugnet.dear-lego, or clarify its purpose
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.nntp
|
Date:
|
Tue, 20 Mar 2001 23:04:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
823 times
|
| |
|
|
lehman@javanet.com (Todd Lehman) writes:
> In lugnet.admin.nntp, William R. Ward writes:
> > I know there is a distinction between the dear-lego and lego.direct
> > groups, but that distinction is a fine one, and it's probably
> > something that a lot of people are confused by. The dear-lego group
> > would have made a lot of sense when TLC wasn't here, but now that we
> > do have (in theory, at least) the ear of Lego Direct, it is kind of
> > odd to have an "open letter to Lego" group and a separate one that LD
> > is expected to use.
>
> I agree. The landscape has changed since .dear-lego was created. I
> heartily invite you to share your thoughts on this thread which touches
> on that very subject:
>
> http://news.lugnet.com/admin/nntp/?n=261
>
> I seems likely to me that .dear-lego isn't needed anymore as it just creates
> confusion.
I have. I posted several articles on that thread. See the results of
this search to see them:
http://news.lugnet.com/admin/nntp/?q=hermit+structure+tough+decisions
--
William R Ward hermit@bayview.com http://www.bayview.com/~hermit/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others."-Groucho Marx
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
3 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
