Subject:
|
Re: Proposal: remove lugnet.dear-lego, or clarify its purpose
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.nntp
|
Date:
|
Sat, 17 Mar 2001 05:16:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
321 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.nntp, William R. Ward writes:
> I know there is a distinction between the dear-lego and lego.direct
> groups, but that distinction is a fine one, and it's probably
> something that a lot of people are confused by. The dear-lego group
> would have made a lot of sense when TLC wasn't here, but now that we
> do have (in theory, at least) the ear of Lego Direct, it is kind of
> odd to have an "open letter to Lego" group and a separate one that LD
> is expected to use.
I agree. The landscape has changed since .dear-lego was created. I
heartily invite you to share your thoughts on this thread which touches
on that very subject:
http://news.lugnet.com/admin/nntp/?n=261
I seems likely to me that .dear-lego isn't needed anymore as it just creates
confusion.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
3 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
