To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.nntpOpen lugnet.admin.nntp in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / NNTP / 606 (-10)
  Re: A letter to Todd
 
(...) I can't speak for the "majority of us", but I for one do not see how you could assume that the majority of the lugnet community believes that what Todd has done is wrong. Personally, when things are agreeable to me, I speak very little of it. (...) (24 years ago, 17-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
 
(...) Well, this "side-effect" (as you call it) has just caused the first trouble in the technic.bionicle group! An AFOL tried to reply to one of my postings, but since he has an *@america.lego.com address it wouldn't let him so I had to do that for (...) (24 years ago, 17-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
 
One time I kinda complained to TLC, I was a little concerned that when you are recieving the Mania Magazine, it is all Adverts and hardly any MOC's, what's the point of this except as a way to generate more hype and previews! That's ok with me but, (...) (24 years ago, 17-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
 
I'm weighing in here on Frank's post because I think he's onto some good ideas. I think Todd is on to some good ideas, too, and here's why I think so. The beauty of .lego.direct is that it is a place where we *know* TLC (LD) is listening. (...) (24 years ago, 17-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  Re: The Relationship - LEGO and its Fans (was: Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings)
 
(...) Um, I still remember a time when a LOT of AFOLs here complained about the lack of communication between Lego and us. Now, we should be happy that some people of Lego Direct actually answer our questions. The particular question on the (...) (24 years ago, 17-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: A letter to Todd
 
(...) Te only thing I said was clear that was people agreed with you. And the vast majority was a reference to the people who were in on the discussion. (...) Yes, that is exactly what I said, did I misquote you or twist your words? No, I did not do (...) (24 years ago, 17-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Web interface "quirk"?
 
Grumble grumble (at myself), I cut and pasted incorrecty and didn't post this originally to .nntp (just to .general twice, which fortunatly resulted in only one post) Sorry about that. (...) (24 years ago, 17-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
 
(...) OK. ++Lar (24 years ago, 17-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
 
(...) Not at all. (...) The arguing. --Todd (...) (24 years ago, 17-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
 
(...) Trust me. OK? --Todd (24 years ago, 17-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR