 | | Re: NNTP interface broken?
|
|
(...) Ah, OK. I get the same thing by telnetting to port 119. Thanks. (...) OK, this group is correct. The last article number is 188, and there are 186 articles present, because 2 in this group were cancelled. (...) OK, this group is incorrect. The (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: NNTP interface broken?
|
|
Ok, it seems you just fix it. This is what I get now: GROUP lugnet.loc.it 211 13087 1 13106 lugnet.loc.it "estimated" < "last": OE is fine with it. Thanks. BTW: why is "estimated" <> "last" - "first"? -- Cheers Carlo LugNet #24 (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Outlook Express and LUGNet
|
|
Hello Todd, (...) fix (...) seems you just did it because now I don't have that error anymore. Thank you ;) Carsten (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Outlook Express and LUGNet
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <todd@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:HFK0u1.1Do7@lugnet.com... (...) would (...) and (...) matching (...) fix (...) What is wierd is that it isn't affecting all groups. For example, lugnet.admin.nntp works fine. I am having (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: NNTP interface broken?
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <todd@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:HFK07y.17Mo@lugnet.com... (...) It is just the NNTP part of the packets. I just did a trace with Ethereal, and this is what I get: GROUP lugnet.loc.eu 211 186 1 188 lugnet.loc.eu GROUP (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Outlook Express and LUGNet
|
|
(...) a-HA! That's the date that I applied the new 'quoted-printable' fix retroactively (to old articles). I haven't a clue, however, why this would confuse Outlook, because the fix only applies to the bodies of messages and not to headers (although (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: NNTP interface broken?
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <todd@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:HFJtGH.44C@lugnet.com... [ ... snipped .. .] (...) to (...) is (...) In the last week or so. I was on the road for a good portion of last week and didn't reach LUGNET as much as I normally do. I (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: NNTP interface broken?
|
|
(...) What kind of trace is that? It doesn't look like a raw NNTP capture. Anyway, could you try something for me? Of those 283 messages, pick a few and download them, then restart Outlook and see how many it reports. (...) If you happen to know (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Outlook Express and LUGNet
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <todd@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:HFJzt6.13I2@lugnet.com... (...) It started 05/21/2003. -- Cheers Carlo LugNet #24 (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Outlook Express and LUGNet
|
|
Hi! For me it started between the 20th and 24th... i can't pinpoint it more exactly since i created the account a copule of times. Play well Carsten "Todd Lehman" <todd@lugnet.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:HFJzt6.13I2@lugnet.com... (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Outlook Express and LUGNet
|
|
(...) A week ago! Whoa. Can you pinpoint an exact date? --Todd [xfut => .admin.nntp] (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: NNTP interface broken?
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <todd@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:HFJtGH.44C@lugnet.com... (...) This is the trace of a connection to lugnet.loc.it: ---...--- GROUP lugnet.loc.it 211 13384 1 13101 lugnet.loc.it ---...--- 13384 - 13101 = 283 283 is the number of (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Outlook Express and LUGNet
|
|
Jaco van der Molen <jmolen@zonnet.nl> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:HFJroM.1wHq@lugnet.com... (...) I too. I'm happy to see that this isn't a problem of mine. I first registered it nearly a week ago at cad.mlcad. But today the same problem with (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: NNTP interface broken?
|
|
(...) No. (...) When did you first observe this behavior? (...) Nothing has changed in the code. Some articles were retro-filtered to decode RFC2047 headers last night, however. (...) Can you tell me the subject lines of those two messages? (...) (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: NNTP interface broken?
|
|
I'm seeing the same behavior as Mike, and the same number of unread articles in the same groups. Todd, is there anything we can do on our end to provide you with additional diagnostics? Cary (...) I >had assumed that my Outlook Express installation (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | NNTP interface broken?
|
|
Did something change in the NNTP interface lately? I am seeing the same behavior as described in this article: (URL) had assumed that my Outlook Express installation had gotten confused (although it has never happened previously) and marked it up as (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Outlook Express and LUGNet
|
|
Hey! I am having the same trouble! Don't know the cause nor cure :-( I have it with the same groups you have and lugnet.cad.ray and I had it with lugnet.loc.nl Jaco "Carsten Schmitz" <casz@gmx.de> schreef in bericht news:HFJq8L.1oC8@lugnet.com... (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Problems with Outlook Express and LUGNet
|
|
Hi! Recently i have some very strange problems with Outlook Express and the LUGNet News server. Newsgroups where these problems occur are: lugnet.cad lugnet.cad.dev lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw lugnet.cad.mlcad This error is reproducable. I am (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Posting with MIME encoded FROM header
|
|
(...) (Just came across this old thread and realized this hadn't yet been fixed.) OK, I've just installed a filter which does this conversion based on the RFC 2047 specification. This eliminiates nasties like =?ISO-8859-1?Q?f=F2=...=20b=E2r?= in (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: quoted-printable support
|
|
(...) Correct -- it never breaks a URL, even if it's 300 characters long or more. It may still break the *line* the URL appears on (and this is why I didn't list this in the conditions above) but it will never break the URL itself. The line-breaking (...) (22 years ago, 21-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
