| | Re: Access a LEGO set DB with your phone!
|
|
(...) reminded how non-obvious its existance is. (URL) are rarely asked for the db in text format, but.. where would you expect to see it as a link? LMK. I know it belongs in the FAQ at the very least... I just activated the sidebar of admin.db and (...) (23 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: Access a LEGO set DB with your phone!
|
|
(...) that is returned when you do queries of the form: (URL) Chris, are you loading data in the background to generate static content (which is what I think) or are you parsing info from the guide in real time? The latter might be an interesting (...) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: Access a LEGO set DB with your phone!
|
|
(...) AFAIK, there is no problem with that. (...) heh, need to figure out how the information could be presented in a useful way. (...) it's already available: (URL)maybe have it say if peeron has an inventory for this set, so you (...) now that (...) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: NNTP newsreader
|
|
(...) yah, but from when I understand the nntp authentication only allows you access to the server - it doesn't verify that you post as yourself only... (...) we've been through this before... an x header works as long as you never typo it - once (...) (23 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: NNTP newsreader
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- (...) Doesn't NNTP have an username/password option? I don't think all NNTP clients support it, but if it could be made optional somehow that could be a way to do it. Or, have you enter a special header line (...) (23 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: NNTP newsreader
|
|
(...) Hi! :) (...) The only way to avoid the email authuntication is to become a member, and post via the web interface, when you're logged in. We just haven't been able to think of a way to verify identities otherwise. Maybe one day we'll implement (...) (23 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people.newbie, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: Posting Dates (Was: The Care and Feedng of Your Trademark (Was: Community Policing...))
|
|
(...) Don't worry about it. Scott A =+= Have you inspected Arthurs Seat yet? (URL) reasonable man adapts himself to suit his environment. An unreasonable man persists in attempting to adapt his environment to suit himself. Therefore, all progress (...) (23 years ago, 1-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: Posting Dates (Was: The Care and Feedng of Your Trademark (Was: Community Policing...))
|
|
(...) I often approve a message via e-mail and it does not appear. I've heard others say the same happens to them. I have no idea if this is what happened here. I noticed my reply had not appeared when I quoted Tim's words yesterday morning in the (...) (23 years ago, 1-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: Posting Dates (Was: The Care and Feedng of Your Trademark (Was: Community Policing...))
|
|
(...) Hmm, I thought it was a function of when one gets around to approving or cancelling messages via the mail interface, *as well as* when that mail gets delivered. Scott has in the past related that he often waits a while (up to several days??) (...) (23 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: Posting Dates (Was: The Care and Feedng of Your Trademark (Was: Community Policing...))
|
|
(...) Indeed! My most abject apologies Scott. Had I caught that error in the posting scheme, I would never have responded as I did! Again, my apologies! Thank you Rob, for catching that mistake. Admins: What is the deal with this? Is it a function (...) (23 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|