|
 | | Re: New feature: Article rating
|
| (...) Ditto to that. I currently can (and do) access Lugnet from at least 5 machines at home, 3 machines in my cube at work, and any number of machines scattered around campus (what else am I supposed to do while waiting for a server to do something (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| 
password
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| | Logging in?
|
| Hello, I hope this is the right place for this... Do I read correctly somewhere that if you login to Lugnet, your posts appear automatically again? i.e. You don't need to confirm them. If so, I would love to take advantage of this! Which leads to my (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
password
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| |
|
password
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| | What happened to my posting setup?
|
| Last night I found out that lugnet wouldn't let me post with out filling out the posting setup again. I filled it out again and every thing seems fine but, I still keep wondering what happened. Lately, I had been having some computer trouble and (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
password
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| | Re: Please help keep LUGNET clean
|
| (...) lugnet.charges lugnet.arraignment lugnet.judgejudy j/k (...) Benevolent dictator, eh? :-) (...) And what is the growth curve? You got a graph or something? (Wouldn't surprise me if you did ;-) (...) Lugnet.admin.city-council for planning (...) (25 years ago, 5-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
password
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| | Re: New feature: Article rating
|
| (...) Excellent. I do foresee one possible area that could be a problem (but I could be overreacting) - Auction/Sale/Trade announcements could all end up with a 75 rating (the initial 50 and then the poster gives it a 100). This could give a false (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
password
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
| (...) OK, that helps. I'll have the server send an e-mail to each of the addresses you listed. Hopefully, one of those is still active and you can reply to show that you received it. But there are a couple of other issues: (1) What happened to your (...) (24 years ago, 6-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
password
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| | Re: New feature: Article rating
|
| (...) I agree. But if Mike's suggestion is taken a little differently, i.e., "I think _I_ should have to sign in to post via the web interface." ...then that's probably a good thing. Once you do decide to beomce a member, you should (it would be (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
password
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| |
|
password
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
| (...) Not if you only disable loggin in as that user from that ip. (...) I think a minimum of 6 characters is a good limit. It's the character diversity that is causeing problems. Also, you could make failed attempts take a few extra seconds to (...) (24 years ago, 25-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
password
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| |
|
password
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| |
|
password
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| | Re: Security (was: Re: I'm back...)
|
| (...) to (...) post a (...) something (...) How would that work with people who have a dialup-account and no fixed IP? What about users behind a firewall (multiple users with one IP)? The other way around: what if people post from different (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
password
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
| (...) Not necessarily. Does (URL) contain links to all the users /~user directories? In 90% of the cases, in my experience,. not. Same for ISPs. So 90% of the web is not intended to be seen by your logic. Security through obscurity is no security at (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
password
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| | LUGNET Admin Resignation
|
| This note is from Kelly McKiernan, Larry Pieniazek, Lenny Hoffman, Tim Courtney, and Frank Filz. There's been a bit of conversation about the reasons behind these members discontinuing admin duties here at LUGNET. Rather than posting a huge (...) (19 years ago, 17-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
password
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| | Re: Traffic Page Squiff?
|
| (...) I got it again :) (URL) 18546b (URL) 20451b Although this time when I diffed the files, as far as I could tell they were the same - the first just got truncated.. The time was 19:33 GMT, and the difference in file size is 1905b. I dunno uf (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
password
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| |
|
password
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| | Re: To Dan or Todd or Suz
|
| (...) Thanks abunch Todd! Sorry I didn't reply right away, but I signed off after I posted. You're a hard man to get ahold of! Dan was a real sport while trying to help me out. With all my emails and my original public request for help, it may have (...) (21 years ago, 9-May-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
password
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| | Security (was: Re: I'm back...)
|
| "blessing" <blessing@icefog.net> wrote in message news:GDvuD0.72r@lugnet.com... (...) AFAIK, yes he is. (...) Because this is an open forum, based on trust: no passwords are required to actually post something. Based on the info I'm required to (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
| |
|
password
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| | Re: DCC reversing loops
|
| (...) 404s are so unfriendly! Even a generic custom 404 page saying to try replacing (URL) with (URL) might be good... you're already returning a custom 404 as it is, it's all fancy and purple and stuff. (...) Did. (I realise you're not just talking (...) (21 years ago, 6-Nov-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
password
(score: 1.000)
|
