 | | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! —Tim Courtney
|
| | | "LUGNET Admin" <suz@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:GM12pn.H5B@lugnet.com... (...) Uhh? With all due respect, I'm not quite following. Reading Matt's post, the only words I see in there are 'crap,' 'suck,' and a numerical representation for a (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! —Dan Boger
|
| | | | | (...) post, (...) exactly. (...) claiming (...) find (...) I really don't think that LUGNET should have as low standards as TV does. but that's besides the point. I think if Suz asked it to be toned down, that's the end of the story - why argue with (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | "Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message news:200110311220.f9...ron.com... (...) My concern in this paragraph is some inconsistency I'm perceiving. Where I recall her not being concerned about this [particular word] before, but now it appears (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! —Dan Boger
|
| | | | | | (...) I (...) now (...) standard (...) argue (...) the (...) unfortunatly, creating a "standard" like that is a very hard (if not impossible) thing to do. For instance, saying "This set is crap" is very very different (at least in my mind) from (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! —Eric Joslin
|
| | | | | | (...) Perhaps, then, it is time to ban him. A little refresher reading for everyone: (URL) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: CRAP![snip] — Suzanne D. Rich
|
| | | | | | | (...) My path leads forward. Please don't trip me. -Suzanne Rich LUGNET Admin (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: CRAP![snip] —Eric Joslin
|
| | | | | | | | (...) It's hard to respond to a fortune cookie, but if you mean that this path leads away from past mistakes, I have a question for you: Is Jesse Alan Long still banned? I would love to hear that his posting ability was re-instated, and that Lugnet (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: CRAP![snip] —Jude Beaudin
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) The good news is you're not bitter about it. :-) Why don't we move on... Jude (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: CRAP![snip] —Duane Hess
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I think that there is a distinction, however small, between JAL's post and Matt's post. I don't want to get in to that though - I don't feel that it's constructive. The thing about Matt's post that I find offensive is the subject line. A (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: CRAP![snip] —Dave Johann
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Duane, Thanks for pointing out exactly where I was going with my argument. He screwed up and got shot down for the language abuse. We can remember the lesson, move on, and all be better for it. -Dave (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! —Dave Johann
|
| | | | | | (...) Alright, I didn't want to jump into this one to continue a thread with a seemingly offensive title (which is worse than strting it, IMHO), but this is a bit much. Frustration over what Matt thought he saw happening was perfectly justified. I (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! —Eric Joslin
|
| | | | | | (...) I'm going to go out on a limb and guess you didn't bother to actually read the thread I pointed to. eric (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! —Dave Johann
|
| | | | | | (...) Then you'd be wrong. -Dave (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! —Bram Lambrecht
|
| | | | (...) Words are less important than the way in which they are used: "...LEGO sucks for bending over and letting the Maori ream them like this..." isn't particularly nice language. And not "giving a rat's @$$" about a culture isn't very nice either. (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
