 | | Re: cant post to rtl
|
|
(...) Actually, what Chris means is he can't post to the rtlToronto NG. Up here in Toronto, we've gotten into a habit of calling rtlToronto, "rtl". Of course, we all know that rtl is rec.toys.lego, the rtl in rtlToronto is derived from that. It's (...) (23 years ago, 25-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: cant post to rtl
|
|
(...) Well, for starters, RTL is most definitely NOT Lugnet. Different things. (...) I'm guessing you mean you tried to post to Lugnet-- not to RTL-- and it does look like your message didn't get here. My guess is either there's an email problem or (...) (23 years ago, 25-Sep-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Problems with the LUGNET Gear pages
|
|
Suzanne/Todd, I was setting up a Cafe Press account today, and thought I'd give you the referral. I wanted to get your store ID, so I went to the Gear pages...since you did your own thing there, I tried placing an order, hoping to get to a Cafe (...) (23 years ago, 25-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet 'Unsuitable for viewing).
|
|
"LUGNET Admin" <suz@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:GJM8L0.3y5@lugnet.com... (...) If they use the Recreational Software Advisory Council service (it comes with ie) Lugnet does not have a certificate(?), so it will deny access. Scott A (...) on (...) (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Sorting Air Safety (Re: Rooting out nests of snakes and destroying them)
|
|
"Dave Low" <stinglessbee@hotSPA...Email.com> wrote in message news:GJx646.ICw@lugnet.com... (...) of angry (...) picture. (...) Show (...) I actually replied to myself. Scott A (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Eat this!!!!!
|
|
(...) Yes, you got that part right. (...) ??? Is this some kind of joke too? Where does eliticism enter here? You expressed bad form, people told you so. (...) It wasn't received as a joke, hence the reactions. (...) Of course I didn't notice, not (...) (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Eat this!!!!!
|
|
(...) reaaaaaaal dry or simplistic. im sorry. dont count on me posting much anymore due to a) elitists, b) NOT ONE PERSON can take a joke... and c) if you didnt notice, i XFUT to OT.fun. rick (23 years ago, 23-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Eat this!!!!!
|
|
"Rick Hallman" <legodude725@removeaol.com> skrev i meddelandet news:GK4JGt.HGB@lugnet.com... (...) With all due respect to the suffering Americans, I don't think this has anything to do with Lego, and it's certainly not following the rules for (...) (23 years ago, 23-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Sorting Air Safety (Re: Rooting out nests of snakes and destroying them)
|
|
(...) Is it time to put an end to this? Could Scott and Larry be banned from replying to each other for a trial period at least? just an idea, DaveL (23 years ago, 19-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New Building (brown)
|
|
(...) If the discussion was around how the module had bearing on the activities of other clubs, yes, otherwise no. (...) See above (...) No. Unless you somehow could tie it into the activities or operations of clubs. It's not enough to just say (...) (23 years ago, 19-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New Building (brown)
|
|
(...) lugnet.trains.org? National and local train clubs/organizations for LEGO® enthusiasts: group formation, founding, planning, announcements, etc.; inter-group coordination and planning; general ideas, thoughts, inspirations, insights, (...) (23 years ago, 19-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New Building (brown)
|
|
(...) That's all well and good but the *post* is primarily about buildings. Review the trains.org charter. Review the building and building.arch charters. If everything that was tangentially related to train organisations was posted there it would (...) (23 years ago, 16-Sep-01, to lugnet.build, lugnet.build.arch, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Looking for pieces from Pirate ship #6289
|
|
(...) I would think that the authentication date would replace the authored date when publishing. Thanks for the (guess) explanation. -Rob. (23 years ago, 14-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Looking for pieces from Pirate ship #6289
|
|
(...) my guess is that while he wrote it on 13-sep-01, he didn't reply to the auth message until 2 hours ago, when the message was posted. does that make sense? :) Dan (23 years ago, 14-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Looking for pieces from Pirate ship #6289
|
|
(...) The date on this message is 13-Sep-01 and shows up on the web interface between 14-Sep messages. It shows up as a 13-Sep message via NNTP. What's up? -Rob. (23 years ago, 14-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet 'Unsuitable for viewing).
|
|
(...) Now that the "Lugent" admin team has spoken, maybe you could ask a librarian? They'd be more likely to know what sort of filters are in place and what is likely to trigger them, since they presumably put the filters in place. I'd be interested (...) (23 years ago, 13-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet 'Unsuitable for viewing).
|
|
I can only assume that there's some site filtering going on there. Perhaps looking for a "news" subdomain? -Suz (...) (23 years ago, 13-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Lugnet 'Unsuitable for viewing).
|
|
Hi, Could one of the members of the Lugent Admin team please explain to me why when I attempted to access the lugnet newsgroups on the web earlier today (via a terminal in a local public library) the site was apparently blocked as being 'unsuitable (...) (23 years ago, 13-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Mech
|
|
(...) I think you shouldn't post sales announcements or links to sales pages in regular newsgroups. You've been instructed nicely not to do this, yet you continue. Please stop. Thanks. ~Grand Admiral Muffin Head (23 years ago, 13-Sep-01, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Tree view not working
|
|
(...) Oops, this was due to a change I made a few days ago...fixed now. Thanks for pointing this out, Susan. --Todd (23 years ago, 11-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
