Subject:
|
Re: New Building (brown)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 19 Sep 2001 13:07:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
638 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, John Neal writes:
>
>
> Larry Pieniazek wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > > > But why is the post to trains.org? Worse, why aren't at least the FUT
> > > > pointing away?
> > >
> > > As I think I mentioned, these are buildings that will appear on the Twin
> > > Cities LEGO Train Club layout. They were built for the purpose of
> > > displaying on a train layout; I personally consider the .build and
> > > .build.arch crossposts only formalities.
> > >
> > > Again, I am an LTD and consider all structures to be merely backdrops for
> > > displaying trains-- for me, it's all about the trains:-)
> >
> > That's all well and good but the *post* is primarily about buildings. Review
> > the trains.org charter. Review the building and building.arch charters.
>
> lugnet.trains.org? National and local train clubs/organizations for
> LEGO® enthusiasts: group formation, founding, planning, announcements,
> etc.; inter-group coordination and planning; general ideas, thoughts,
> inspirations, insights, experiences, etc.
>
> > If everything that was tangentially related to train organisations was
> > posted there it would be fearful clutter. I could argue that I ought to post
> > information (or auction listings) I heard about eBay there because some
> > train orgs sometimes go there to get parts. That is taking your reasoning to
> > a ludicrous extreme but it's a difference in degree, not kind.
>
> Yes, your example is extremely ludicrous. How about this example, which is
> more analogous. What if I posted a picture of one of my club's modules? >Would you consider trains.org an appropriate place?
If the discussion was around how the module had bearing on the activities of
other clubs, yes, otherwise no.
> What if one of those pics
> included buildings?
See above
> What if one of those pics was *just* of one of those
> buildings?
No. Unless you somehow could tie it into the activities or operations of
clubs. It's not enough to just say 'these are buildings for some club'
Review the charter.
> general ideas, thoughts,
> inspirations, insights, experiences, etc.
refers to club operations. Not just any general ideas about anything at all.
> > Not for long. I set FUT admin.general since clearly you're having trouble
> > understanding the charters of the various groups.
>
> You clearly have too much spare time; go split hairs somewhere else.
This is not splitting hairs, it is trying to keep the groups properly
compartmentalised. You goofed and you're trying to cover it up. Why not just
admit it instead of squirming?
> > Suz will set me straight
> > if I am misunderstanding the various charters, I am sure.
>
> Maybe not-- no one has *that* much spare time;-)
A simple yes or no, especially when it's so obvious that you're incorrect,
won't take long.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New Building (brown)
|
| (...) lugnet.trains.org? National and local train clubs/organizations for LEGO® enthusiasts: group formation, founding, planning, announcements, etc.; inter-group coordination and planning; general ideas, thoughts, inspirations, insights, (...) (23 years ago, 19-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
