Subject:
|
Re: Possible problem/bug
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 30 Aug 2001 16:04:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
274 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Fredrik Glöckner writes:
> "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> writes:
>
> > Speculating: I suspect it was a policy change because the effect of
> > Supersede on the historical record is that you changed a particular
> > article at the very point in the thread where it previously was,
> > which is in effect an edit.
>
>
> No, that is not true. Superseding is technically mostly the same as
> canceling and reposting the article. The new article gets a new
> Message-ID and a new article number. It's not like editing an article
> at all.
Well then never mind, I'm all wet and I have no idea why it stopped working.
Sounds like a bug rather than an intended policy change.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Possible problem/bug
|
| (...) No, that is not true. Superseding is technically mostly the same as canceling and reposting the article. The new article gets a new Message-ID and a new article number. It's not like editing an article at all. I've used Supersedes on LUGNET a (...) (23 years ago, 30-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
