To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 9527
9526  |  9528
Subject: 
Re: Possible problem/bug
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Thu, 30 Aug 2001 15:57:55 GMT
Viewed: 
273 times
  
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> writes:

Speculating: I suspect it was a policy change because the effect of
Supersede on the historical record is that you changed a particular
article at the very point in the thread where it previously was,
which is in effect an edit.


No, that is not true.  Superseding is technically mostly the same as
canceling and reposting the article.  The new article gets a new
Message-ID and a new article number.  It's not like editing an article
at all.


I've used Supersedes on LUGNET a few times, and whenever I did, I
could see a "Cancelled" placeholder for the old one in the thread tree
on the LUGNET news web interface.


Mail subscribers, as you say, are aware that you did it, but news
and web viewers who come later are not. All they see are the edited
words.


Not at all.  News subscribers will see the new article, but they will
not see the old one anymore once the new is posted.  If they read news
frequently, it will occur to them that the message got posted twice,
albeit with some changes the second time.


Fredrik



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Possible problem/bug
 
(...) Well then never mind, I'm all wet and I have no idea why it stopped working. Sounds like a bug rather than an intended policy change. (23 years ago, 30-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
  Re: Possible problem/bug
 
BTW, here's an example of a superseded article: news://lugnet.com/<m...de.uio.no> (Normally, I would have superseded my original article to add this comment, but now that it doesn't work, I'll post a followup in stead...) Fredrik (23 years ago, 30-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Possible problem/bug
 
(...) Speculating: I suspect it was a policy change because the effect of Supersede on the historical record is that you changed a particular article at the very point in the thread where it previously was, which is in effect an edit. Mail (...) (23 years ago, 30-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.general)

12 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR