 | | Re: Informal CFD: robotics competition newsgroup(s) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | (...) I could go either way. I suppose that a lugnet.comp.* hierarchy could expand someday, to cover various software packages and online stuff. No, wait. I changed my mind. How much potential is there for *computer-centered* discussion on lugnet? (...) (26 years ago, 19-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Informal CFD: robotics competition newsgroup(s) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Good point. If ever there is any .comp.* hierarchy, maybe it'll end up being inside the .off-topic.* hierarchy. Sure seems to be a lot of good geeking going on lately there in terms of overclocking CPUs and video cards and all that great (...) (26 years ago, 19-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Informal CFD: robotics competition newsgroup(s) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | (...) It gets back to expectations of behavior (both people and machines). As a mail-list subsriber, I'd expect the list to behave one way. As an ng reader, I'd have different expectations. If Chris Atlas had posted to lugnet.anything-else, I doubt (...) (26 years ago, 19-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Informal CFD: robotics competition newsgroup(s) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) I grok what you're saying, almost. It's the conclusion that I have trouble making the quantum-leap to. :) OK, so the robotics ng has a different character or flavor or group-behavior than other groups...I grok that. How does it follow that the (...) (26 years ago, 19-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Informal CFD: robotics competition newsgroup(s) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) Umm, I'd put all ng's with the flavor of being echoes of external mailing-lists into a hierarchy of lugnet.mailing-echo.* Not to say that would make any substantial difference in anything. It just feels right to me. Steve (26 years ago, 19-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Informal CFD: robotics competition newsgroup(s) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) But: (1) The whole point in the first place of linking ba-lego@cinnamon.com with lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf was to bring those two particular pre-existing groups together. If ba-lego@cinnamon.com was echoed over in a .mailing-echo.* hierarchy, then (...) (26 years ago, 20-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Informal CFD: robotics competition newsgroup(s) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) I suppose. But only if there a N pre-existing mailing lists. Since each of the lugnet ng's is a mailing list, if a separate ml didn't exist before, there's no reason for to create one after the ng-ml appears. Unless there's someone(s) who (...) (26 years ago, 20-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Informal CFD: robotics competition newsgroup(s) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) I'm thinkin' it's possible (if not likely) that other existing mailing lists analagous to ba-lego@cinnamon.com will continue to surface from time to time and desire to be hooked into a .loc group. Maybe not often, but maybe a couple or more a (...) (26 years ago, 21-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Informal CFD: robotics competition newsgroup(s) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) I guess it would be a mess, wouldn't it? It's just my inclination on ng organization would be to put all the ml-ng's together in one place. Not a topical sort, but a functional one. But that doesn't work well when trying to connect existing (...) (26 years ago, 21-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Informal CFD: robotics competition newsgroup(s) —Dave Baum
|
| | | | (...) RCXCC uses NQC as its compiler, so I think including RCXCC in an NQC newsgroup is appropriate. I don't know anything about RCXLib for Palm (although the NQC source distribution has its own version of an RCXLib). Dave (26 years ago, 20-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
