 | | Re: Web interface cancels (was Re: Let's define what an auction announcement/update is)
|
|
(...) I think it could be cookie based (he said, while simulteneously knowing nothing about cookies). After all, posting identity is cookie based, is it not? Do we really need to worry about "rogue cancellers" cancelling all kinds of Lugnet posts (...) (25 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: STUPID QUESTION?
|
|
(...) Awesome! :) When did this start working? I swear, it didn't use to do this... And exclusion works, too. Put "-cypress" to ignore all those expensive parts. This is Most Cool. Too bad this doesn't actually answer Dave!'s question. Searching for (...) (25 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Web interface cancels (was Re: Let's define what an auction announcement/update is)
|
|
(...) Agree. Taking away cancel from NNTP would probably be a step backwards-- I don't want to stoop to the lowest common denominator... But it'd be nice to be able to cancel things via the web interface, or at least things posted via the web (...) (25 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Web interface cancels (was Re: Let's define what an auction announcement/update is)
|
|
(...) For what it's worth, I agree with both of you(!!) inasmuch as getting cancel rights to the web interface, although if it's not possible for one reason or other I wouldn't want to see it taken away from NNTP. eric (25 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Let's define what an auction announcement/update is
|
|
(...) I agree with Larry(!). If nothing else, I'd like to see equality between web and nttp posters - even if we have to take away the nttp right to cancel. Scott A (...) (25 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Let's define what an auction announcement/update is
|
|
(...) Please reconsider providing a mechanism for cancelling web originated posts that is more automated than "send Todd a note in email and hope he sees it". ++Lar (25 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: STUPID QUESTION?
|
|
(...) The only amendment I'll make is that having a quoted string be a search word (not regarded as two) would be helpful-- If I'm looking for posts about THE classic castle, the search string: +classic +castle may very well show me a lot more of (...) (25 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: LP POINT 3.2
|
|
(...) If Todd were to think that I am being deliberately disruptive in this group, I'm sure he would just stop me from posting in it. If I were being deliberately disruptive in this group, I'd expect to be stopped. But the fact is, I'm not (...) (25 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Query regarding the <set:foo> function
|
|
(...) Cool. Thanks for the fast fix. James (25 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Query regarding the <set:foo> function
|
|
(...) (25 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Query regarding the <set:foo> function
|
|
(...) using a greedy match where it should have been using a non-greedy match. The "<snip>" that appeared earlier on the line confused it. Thanks for reporting the err. --Todd (25 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Query regarding the <set:foo> function
|
|
Hi Todd, I'm curious as to why this worked: (URL) this didn't: (URL) (25 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Is it time for lugnet.build.sculpture ?
|
|
(...) Maybe there sh/could be a direct link to .build from the LUGNET home page? "Check out what other fans are building, or post about your own creations!" (...) I think the problem is for people to *find* .build. Once they've gone that far, (...) (25 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: Preview: LUGNET T-Shirts, Mousepads, Coffee Mugs
|
|
Just curious...will the Mugs be available anytime soon? TIA, Jason "Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:FwuI3E.ICz@lugnet.com... (...) color-matching (...) itself (...) logo (...) the (...) shirts (...) of (...) and (...) aren't (...) (25 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | How does shop function work?
|
|
How does your shop function "pick up" that a store sells a particular set. For instance Etoys and Wal-mart are carrying the 8458, but it doesn't show up under the shop function. Please explain. Rose (25 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | LUGNET is fast today
|
|
I noticed a significant increase in speed when loding pages today, especially the front news page. Also the pages load different than before - the whole page just pops up when its done loading. The effect is like setting Response.Buffer = True in (...) (25 years ago, 25-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: "jump.cgi" considered harmful ? (1)
|
|
(...) It seems that slow DNS is the culprit if Todd is right. Why does cutting and pasting make it go faster? If Todd is right, you would have to pay the same DNS price either way. Or is it just a perceived speedup? Well, I've set FUT o-t.geek to (...) (25 years ago, 25-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: dead link?
|
|
(...) Yes. This is now a dead link. I had to take it down a few weeks ago and neglected to inform anyone. The purpose of the page was simply to show that OmniRemote for the Palm could be trained with IR commands from the IR tower or MindStorms (...) (25 years ago, 24-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: News/Discussion Group Traffic (Fri 24 Nov 2000)
|
|
(...) Can you tell it was a US holiday? ;-) Jude (25 years ago, 24-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: "jump.cgi" considered harmful ? (1)
|
|
(...) It isn't just you. I notice the delay as well on every machine I use - fast or slow, on every connection I use, fast or slow. Last time I looked into this (and I think posted about it) it seemed fairly obvious the biggest delays were had by IE (...) (25 years ago, 24-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
